Search Results

1. GN v HJ LCRO 30/2015 (22 June 2016) [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Ms GN has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee [X] dated 15 December 2014. The Committee found that Mr HJ’s failure to provide information to Ms GN contravened rule 3.5 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008. The Committee concluded the fees charged for services provided to Ms GN were fair and reasonable pursuant to rules 9 and...

2. NLT v Coetzee [2019] NZIACDT 81 (10 December 2019) [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...satisfaction as to there being no malicious intent. Ms Coetzee was advised that there was no clear pathway for employment on a contract basis, but reasons could be put forward as to why a contract was needed for particular employment. Complainant requested to leave New Zealand [35] Immigration New Zealand served the complainant with a deportation liability notice on 17 May 2017, as he was working in breach of his visa conditions. This led to his departure from New Zealand. COMPL...

3. NM & B Ltd v J Ltd & RJ Ltd [2021] NZDT 1662 (9 August 2021) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...backs onto [Street]. In early 2018, work started on building a school on an adjacent block of land on the other side of the lane. The construction included earthworks and drainage using heavy machinery. 5. In late August 2018, work started on reforming [Street]. The initial work involved using an excavator to remove the existing concrete driveway. The excavator was used to break up the concrete for removal by truck. 6. The roadway was formed by placing six layers of road met...

4. [2022] NZEnvC 215 Southland District Council v Peter Chartres [pdf, 958 KB]

   ...2015, clearance activities at the Station were the subject of several further complaints and investigations by Council staff, none of which culminated in any enforcement action until late in 2015. Until late 2015, Council officers (seemingly) formed the view that clearance activities were, or appeared to be, permitted by HER.3. From what we glean from that correspondence, their approach to the rule was informed by the age of the vegetation and timing of the clearance. [32] Later...

5. Appendix-11_Michaela-Stout_S87F-Report_Water-Take_28-April-2023.pdf [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   SJ-030235-390-1009-V1:JHB-e Section 87F Report – Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project (Ō2NL Project) Prepared by Michaela Stout – Surface Water Abstractions in the Manawatū- Whanganui Region 1 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of applications by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency (Waka Kotahi) to Manawatū-Whanganui Regional Council and Greater Wellington Regional Council for resource consents to enable the cons

6. Pickering v Reihana - Motatau 2 Section 21B2E (2021) 231 Taitokerau MB 103 (231 TTK 103) [pdf, 323 KB]

   ...records which are relevant. The following does not refer to all documents filed in this proceeding, but to those which I consider bear on the question in this case. [43] On 14 June 1997, a meeting of the Reihana whānau was held to discuss forming a trust. At that time, a resolution was passed to form a whānau trust. The minutes for that meeting also record the following resolution: Mama McKay: I wish to make a motion that the Trustees be directed to look into providing ...

7. Paul v Doorbar - Pukepapa 3 (2020) 414 Aotea MB 16 (414 AOT 16) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...together with David Doorbar and Alice Katene Doorbar, are now the trustees of the marae reservation. Robert Paul then resigned on 28 February 2019. Procedural history [8] The application was first heard on 20 June 2017.6 While I had received a request for an adjournment, as the trustees and the committee members of OHMC could not attend, the hearing proceeded with Ms Paul as a further fixture would not take place until later in the year. Ms Paul raised concerns about obtaining...

8. [2023] NZEnvC 096 AJ & VF Barr Family Trust v Whakatane District Council [pdf, 622 KB]

   ...if it contains a clerical mistake or an error arising from an accidental slip or omission. The parties have asked for these clarifications and the Court is satisfied that they clarify but do not alter the decision, therefore the Court makes the requested changes without further consideration or comment. Correction to condition 5 Counsel for the Appellant advised a correction to Condition 5 should be made because: (a) it was agreed with the Applicant that condition 5 would be a...

9. [2011] NZEmpC 37 Vice-Chancellor of Massey University v Wrigley and Kelly [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...concerns, Professor Kemp told them that Massey considered they were assisting in an evaluative process that was confidential. As such, Massey did not intend to release the comments made by panel members during the selection process and they were informed that it was not normal Massey process to release such comments. Because the union representing the staff (the Tertiary Education Union) had already indicated to Massey that it would be seeking the information generated in the sele...

10. OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL v NGA RUNANGA NOE.pdf [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    ...along with the Soil Management Award from Balance and the Waterwise Award from Water Force, thank you. 15 Q. And can you describe your role with the Manuherikia Catchment Group? A. I'm the chair of the Manuherikia Catchment Group which was formed in 2019 I think. Q. And was that the group that was formed to advance the reconsenting project? 20 A. Yes. To advance the reconsenting progress and to be a cohesive voice for the minimum flow process. Q. Ms Gillespie can you sim...