Search Results

1. White and Te Korowai Tiaki o Te Hauāuru Incorporated Society v Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Tama Trust (2020) 415 Aotea MB 164 (415 AOT 164) [pdf, 290 KB]

   ...would grant directions to enable the major transaction vote to proceed and that, given the uncertain environment, it was premature to set down a timetable for the substantive hearing. In response, counsel for the Rūnanga agreed to prepare the form of the directions that should be granted under s 66 of the Trustee Act and counsel for Te Korowai helpfully indicated a preparedness to review those directions (without prejudice to Te Korowai’s substantive position on whether the direct...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 014 Fleming v Waikato District Council [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...Rural Lifestyle Zone which has a minimum lot size of 5,000m2. 5 Appeal [9] The appeal seeks the rezoning of the appeal area to the Settlement Zone. The Settlement Zone is the nearest equivalent NPS zone to the Village Zone (which was requested in the original submission). The Settlement Zone has a minimum lot size of 2,500m2. [10] There are no s 274 parties to the appeal. [11] The Appellants and Respondent have held discussions to explore ways of resolving the app...

3. [2020] NZEnvC 166 Lindis Catchment Group Incorporated v Otago Regional Council.pdf [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...designed to have at least a 1m vertical drop from the top of the barrier to the water level downstream with a 500mm overhang on the downstream edge of the barrier. c. The bed of the stream below the barrier must be concreted flat to prevent a pool forming immediately below the barrier. 10.4 Within one year of obtaining resource consent under condition 10.1 b. or certification if condition 10.1 c. applies, the consent holder must erect, operate and maintain at the consent holder's...

4. LCRO 126-2017 PC v The Committee [pdf, 281 KB]

   ...taken appropriate steps to ensure the accuracy of the certification [41] In essence, the prohibition in the rule requires that the lawyer concerned take positive steps to ensure that the truth of the matter in respect of which the lawyer has been requested, or proposes to provide a certificate is accurate.27 Only if the lawyer then “believes on reasonable grounds” that “the matter certified is true” may the lawyer provide the certificate concerned.

5. OWRUG - Supplementary - S Dicey - Planning - 19 March 2021 [pdf, 573 KB]

   ...Pelsemaeker; and (c) My amendments to PC7 in response to Mr De Pelsemaeker’s updated version, and in response to matters raised both by the Court and by other parties in this hearing to date. Scope 4. The submission by OWRUG included relief requesting that PC7 be declined in its entirety (paragraph 194). The changes to PC7 proposed in my supplementary evidence are therefore within the scope of the relief sought by OWRUG. In addition, these changes only deal with PC7 (rather...

6. [2018] NZEnvC 155 Tasman District Council v G Baigent [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...evidence did not establish that to the extent that the waterbodies in question were rivers (ie streams), they were greater than 3 metres average bed width. They did not appear to be to me on my site visit. Although the water in this area clearly forms a body of water, no party seriously suggested that it was a lake, even though it was surrounded by land. There was clear evidence that the water flows (albeit at a very slow rate). I take the matter of breach of Rule 18.5.2.1 no furthe...

7. 2020-10-16-EPA-PC8-Summary-of-Submissions-Further-Submission-Spreadsheet.xlsx [xlsx, 187 KB]

   Summary of submissions Provision Submitter ID Submission Point ID Name Support / Oppose Decision requested (see submission for reasons) Submission on PC1? Submission refers to PC7? Request to be heard Will consider joint case Further Submitter ID Further Submitter Name Support/Oppose Plan Change 8 80004 80004.01 Maori Point Vineyard Ltd (Arthur) Oppose Approve the plan change with amendments as outlined below Y Y N Part A: Policy 7.C.6(b) 80004 80004.02 Maori Point Vineyard Ltd (Arthur) Oppos...

8. [2021] NZEnvC 133 Woolworths New Zealand Limited [pdf, 1 MB]

   WOOLWORTHS NZ LTD v CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision [2021] NZEnvC 133 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND an application under s87G of the RMA BETWEEN WOOLWORTHS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (ENV-2020-CHC-001) Applicant AND CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Consent Authority Court: Environment Judge P A Steven Alternate Environment Judge L J Newhook Environment Commissione

9. Regulatory Impact Assessment relating to a cannabis regulatory model [pdf, 7.6 MB]

   Context to the Regulatory Impact Assessment: Cannabis regulatory model 1. A Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) accompanies a Cabinet decision-making paper regarding regulatory change. It typically provides a high-level summary of the problem being addressed, the options, their associated costs and benefits, the consultation undertaken, and the proposed arrangements for implementation and review. 2. This RIA was produced by the Ministry of Justice in May 2019. It was provided to Cab

10. ZA v YB LCRO 135/2014 (31 August 2016) [pdf, 76 KB]

    ...to the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal. Review Hearing [6] Mr ZA attended a review hearing on 23 October 2015. Mr YB was not required to attend and the review hearing proceeded in his absence with his consent. Mr ZA requested a copy of the audio of the review hearing. That has been provided to both parties. Recusal Application [7] Mr ZA requested my recusal from determining this review. For the reasons set out in the decision to which this decision is...