Search Results

1. Taueki v Procter - Horowhenua 11 (Lake) (2021) 437 Aotea MB 86 (437 AOT 86) [pdf, 389 KB]

   ...CHARLES RUDD Ngā Kaitono Applicants ME And JONATHAN PROCTER, MATHEW SWORD, MAROKOPA MATAKATEA, ROBERT WARRINGTON, KELLY TAHIWI, KERI TE PA, WAYNE HURUNUI, NEDDY NAHONA, TIMOTHY TUKAPUA, CAROLINE O’DONNELL AND KEREHI WARENA AS FORMER TRUSTEES OF THE HOROWHENUA 11 PART RESERVATION TRUST Ngā Kaiurupare Respondents Nohoanga: Hearing On the papers Kanohi kitea: Appearances Whakataunga: Judgment L Watson for P Taueki L Thornt...

2. Appendix-4-Additional-submissions.pdf [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   Sunny Kaushal | Chairman Ministerial Advisory Group - Retail Crime Ministry of Justice, Govt of New Zealand Defence of Property and Powers to Detain I am writing in response to your request for input on the proposal "Empowering Security Industry to Deal with Retail Offenders." As a security industry veteran with over four decades of experience spanning law enforcement and private security, I am pleased to offer my insights on this critical matter. Given my unique perspective bridgi...

3. Epere - Waima A12B and 2 others and Taheke 25 and 1 other (2012) 35 Taitokerau 131 (35 TKT 131) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...allegation of undue influence as being unsupported by the evidence. Valuation [42] An issue arises in relation to the valuation of the land and the applicants’ non- compliance with the 1994 Rules. [43] The applications were accompanied by requests for exemption from the requirements of s 158 to furnish a special valuation in respect of each block. Such requests are normal where a gifting is taking place. An exemption would likely have been granted if the matter was not contes...

4. Smith v ACC [2010] NZACA 6 [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...right carpal tunnel syndrome. It was noted therein that the injury had occurred on 15 September 1989. [7] The appellant was certified unfit to work from 15 September 1989. According to an earnings questionnaire for self-employed persons form completed on 24 November 1989 the appellant was a self-employed painter and decorator trading under the business name of ‘BB Services’. This business had commenced in or about October 1988. 3 [8] As the appellant’s...

5. Pita v Ngatiwai ki Whangaruru Whenua Topu Trust - Whangaruru Whakaturia 1D9A and Whangaruru Whakaturia 1D10A (2010) 10 Taitokerau MB 40 (10 TTK 40) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...reserved “as a Māori reservation for the common use of the Ngatiwai Tribe as a marae and meeting-place.” [9] In about 1951 the marae buildings burnt down. The buildings were not re-built until the early 1980s when the marae committee was formed. [10] In 1967 the Crown expressed an interest in acquiring 1D9A and 1D10A for recreational purposes. On 29 November 1967 (43 Whangarei 272-273) the Court appointed the Whangaruru Ngatiwai Trust Board (“WNTB”) as trustee in replacem...

6. Environment Court Annual Review 2016 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...the Environment Court’s robust case management system now moves these along to prompt resolution by hearing, and sometimes settlement prior to a hearing being needed. It should be recorded that there are occasionally cases where delays are requested by parties for good cause. Cases are moved to the Hold Track when this occurs. Examples are given in the earlier section of this Review that describes the case management tracks. Environment Court of New Zealand Annual Review 201...

7. Environment Court Annual Review 2016 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...the Environment Court’s robust case management system now moves these along to prompt resolution by hearing, and sometimes settlement prior to a hearing being needed. It should be recorded that there are occasionally cases where delays are requested by parties for good cause. Cases are moved to the Hold Track when this occurs. Examples are given in the earlier section of this Review that describes the case management tracks. Environment Court of New Zealand Annual Review 201...

8. Proactive Release: Response to the third Universal Periodic Review recommendations [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...Review Recommendations Cabinet paper Date of issue: 18 September 2019 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (18) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has been identified that would outweigh the reasons for withholding it. No...

9. [2024] NZEnvC 005 New Zealand Transport Agency Inc v Horowhenua District Council [pdf, 917 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY – WAKA KOTAHI v HOROWHENUA DISTRICT COUNCIL IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 005 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under cl 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY – WAKA KOTAHI (ENV-2022-WLG-000027) Appellant AND HOROWHENUA DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Judge L J Semple sitting alone under s 279 of

10. [2013] NZEmpC 240 Fox v Hereworth School Trust Board Second Interlocutory [pdf, 212 KB]

    ...against three named Hereworth staff and the mandatory reporting of the plaintiff’s dismissal under the Education Act. Ms Lee’s evidence is that all of this has previously been provided to Mrs Fox pursuant to an Official Information Act 1982 request by the plaintiff to the New Zealand Teachers Council. [25] Mrs Fox’s response concedes that although she has had some documentation from the New Zealand Teachers Council pursuant to an Official Information Act request, she does n...