Search Results

1. HortNZ - Updated EiC - V Hodgson - Planning - 13 April 2021 [pdf, 879 KB]

   ...Attachment A from the original submission of Horticulture New Zealand (HortNZ), adopting the format of the notified plan. Alternatively, the Court has asked that if I support some of the later amendments as proposed by Mr de Pelsemaeker, then I am requested to reproduce that version with such further changes as I may recommend. 10. This statement updates my EIC to the extent that I comment on the specific provisions of PC7 and is to be read in conjunction with my EIC. As will...

2. Hauiti v Tamati - Puhunga A7D1 (2017) 68 Tairawhiti MB 100 (68 TRW 100) [pdf, 334 KB]

   ...of the land at the time of the trespass. Who had possession of the land at the time of the trespass? Applicants’ submissions [37] Ms Bennett argued that although the applicants were not occupiers of the property at the time the applicants requested Ms Tamati vacate, she has nonetheless committed a tort of trespass. [38] In addition Ms Bennett submitted that the circumstances of this case come within the exception to the general principle that only a person who had possession o...

3. Holmes v Housing New Zealand Corporation [2014] NZHRRT 54 [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...2000 this 52 week income statement was generated manually by MSD and a paper copy sent to the applicant for SAS or to the tenant seeking an IRR. The tenant would then deliver the document to HNZC. Initially the SAS applicant or IRR tenant could request the statement directly from MSD or alternatively, HNZC staff could contact MSD by telephone to request the statement on behalf of the applicant/tenant. The statement would then be sent to the applicant or tenant, not to HNZC. [23] Fro...

4. Hammond v Credit Union Baywide [2015] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 265 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2015] NZHRRT 6 Reference No. HRRT 027/2013 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN KAREN MAY HAMMOND PLAINTIFF AND CREDIT UNION BAYWIDE DEFENDANT AT NAPIER BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms WV Gilchrist, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms KM Hammond in person supported by Ms J Gooding as McKenzie friend Mr AJ Harris and Mr GJC Ferguson for defendant DATE OF HE

5. Evidence Brief: Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy [pdf, 317 KB]

   Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy EVIDENCE BRIEF Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is a core form of psychological treatment for offenders. CBT has been well researched and shown to reliably reduce reoffending among many groups of offenders. There is substantial potential to increase its provision for young offenders. OVERVIEW • Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy is the cornerstone of modern approaches to rehabilitate offenders. • CBT has been extensively implemented in...

6. Pook v Matchitt - Matangareka 3B Block [2020] Māori Appellate Court MB 126 (2020 APPEAL 126) [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...3040 curtis.bidois@eastbrewster.co.nz J Pou, Tu Pono Legal, JP 30025, Rotorua 3040 pou@tupono.co.nz mailto:curtis.bidois@eastbrewster.co.nz 2020 Māori Appellate Court 127 Introduction [1] Edward Matchitt brought proceedings against the former trustees of the Matangareka 3B Ahu Whenua Trust, including the second appellants, claiming inter alia, that they had failed to manage conflicts of interest with the result that they had profited from their office. [2] Hearings took p...

7. ENV-2016-AKL-000277 Auckland Transport v KiwiRail Holdings Limited [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...Auckland Transport, as the Road Controlling Authority, which represents a relevant aspect of the public interest, and/or has an interest in the proposal that is greater than the interest the general public has. This is because submission number 4336-191 requests relief that affects the local road network. With the limited clarification and information provided by KiwiRail Holdings Limited, Auckland Transport opposes submission 4336-191. The particular part of the submission Auckland Tra...

8. [2021] NZEnvC 036 Wood & Henton v Auckland Council [pdf, 9.8 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MA TIER OF BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 03 b appeals under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 E WOOD AND S HENTON (ENV-2021 -AKL-000005) CCORCORAN (ENV-2021-AKL-000006) SPAN FAIUvI BOAT YARD LIMITED (ENV-2021-AKL-000007) Appellants AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent AUCKLAND .COUNCIL (COMMUNITY FACILITIES) Applicant Court: EnvironmentJudge MJ L Dick

9. [2023] NZEnvC 007 Ravenswood Developments Limited v Waimakariri Distrrict Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...279(1)(b) of the Resource Management Act 1991, the Environment Court, by consent, orders that: the appeal is allowed to the extent that Plan Change 30 to the Waimakariri District Plan is accepted in accordance with Appendix 1, attached to and forming part of this order; 2 the appeal is otherwise dismissed. B: Under s 285 of the Resource Management Act 1991, there is no order as to costs. REASONS Introduction [1] This proceeding concerns an appeal by Ravenswood Developm...

10. [2013] NZEmpC 117 Morgan v Whanganui College Board of Trustees [pdf, 163 KB]

    ...of agreed facts. [9] On 29 March 2012 Mr Morgan restrained a student physically in the course of separating students engaged in what is described as a “bullying incident”. Mr Morgan reported the incident to the school’s management and was requested to provide a report about the incident which he did on the following morning, 30 March 2012. [10] By 5 April 2012, when Mr Morgan met with senior management of the school, he had what is described as a “legal representative”...