Search Results

1. Mackey - Succession to Rangi Hawea MacKey (2022) 113 Tairawhiti MB 37 (113 TRW 37) [pdf, 419 KB]

   ...to from the deceased. All his siblings, being the remaining children of the deceased, have signed a Deed of Whānau Arrangement dated 4 April 2016. That deed records at clause “E” that: 113 Tairawhiti MB 39 The whānau have requested Wi to transfer the lands in the Schedule to the MACKEY WHAIPOOTI WHĀNAU TRUST which is in accordance with decisions made at the whānau meeting on 22 June 2015, the minutes of which are attached. 1. The whānau now direct Wi as...

2. 02.-Evidence-of-Ms-Dianne-Rump-Muaupoko-Tribal-Authority64019775.1.PDF [PDF, 321 KB]

   ...team from its Treaty partnership with the Crown (and by extension, Waka Kotahi). 2 See Figure 1 on page 8 of the CIA. 3 Page 11 of the CIA. 4 Muaupoko Customary Interests (justice.govt.nz) 5 MuaupokoLand Interests (justice.govt.nz) https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/WT/wt_DOC_96386105/Wai%202200%2C%20A182.pdf https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/WT/wt_DOC_96559171/Wai%202200%2C%20A185.pdf Page 8 26. In our view holding this space for each Project par...

3. [2023] NZEnvC 174 Barbican Securities Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 292 KB]

   ...Land removed from future productive use [19] With respect to land lost to future rural productive use as a result of new dwellings and resultant curtilage, we note that the Appellant has offered to limit the extent and position of building platforms and secure the same by way of consent notice. We advance on the premise outlined inter alia in Guardians of Paku Bay Association Inc v Waikato Regional Council,9 that such conditions can and will be complied with and enforced. We furth...

4. [2024] NZSAAA 1 (20 September 2024) [pdf, 771 KB]

   ...good reason to further delay determination of this appeal. In particular, I found that the Appellant remained able to: (a) provide all relevant information to the Authority; and (b) properly respond to information provided by the Ministry and requests for information from the Authority. [9] Accordingly, in a Minute of 19 July 2024, I declined to delay the appeal further and advised the parties that I would proceed to determine this appeal after giving the Appellant further oppo...

5. [2019] NZEnvC 166 Lindis Catchment Group Incorporated v Otago Regional Council [pdf, 16 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 166 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of Plan Change SA to the Regional Plan Water for Otago of an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act LINDIS CATCHMENT GROUP INCORPORATED (ENV-2016-CHC-61) Appellant OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court : Environment Judge J R Jackson Environment Commissioner KA Edmonds Environme

6. Butler v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal Injury, Causation) [2023] NZACC 165 [pdf, 540 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 165 ACR 64/19 ACR 61/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN MARTIN BUTLER Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 16 March 2023 Heard at: Wellington Appearances: Mr M Butler, appellant in person S M Kinsler and M L Clarke-Parker for r

7. [2024] NZEnvC 293 Waimarino Queenstown Limited (as successor to B Property Group Ltd) v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 648 KB]

   WAIMARINO QUEENSTOWN LTD (AS SUCCESSOR TO B PROPERTY GROUP LTD) v QLDC IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 293 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN WAIMARINO QUEENSTOWN LIMITED (AS SUCCESSOR TO B PROPERTY GROUP LIMITED) (ENV-2023-CHC-1) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven Environm

8. RF v CN LCRO 254/2012 (3 November 2016) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...[6] On [Date] Mr QW, the lawyer for the real estate agency, emailed Ms CN asking her to obtain instructions from Mr DS as to whether he could identify the agent with whom he says he discussed the property. [7] Mr RF was never advised that this request had been made. There is no evidence that Ms CN contacted Mr DS, nor is there any evidence of her having replied to Mr QW. [8] Mr RF had difficulty in paying the legal fees charged. On [Date] he entered into a deed of acknowledgement o...

9. 14.-Ainsley-McLeod-Conditions.pdf [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...discussed or agreed with submitters; (c) respond to matters raised in the section 87F report and reflect amendments to conditions recommended in that report; and (d) show an amendment suggested in the Transport Agency’s response to Horizons' request for further information made under section 92 of the RMA. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14. The design of the Project has sought to avoid adverse effects on the environment where it is possible to do so. In their evidence, Mr Tim Watter...

10. [2022] NZIACDT 29 - EQ v McCarthy (19 December 2022) [pdf, 322 KB]

    ...[9] On 26 November 2019, Mr McCarthy emailed to the complainant and/or her husband a list of “personal documents” needed later for residence.2 He said he would advise what investment documents were required, once the funds and earnings information had been finalised. [10] The complainant paid Mr McCarthy $5,183.33 on 2 December 2019. There is an invoice of the same date. First expression filed [11] On 17 December 2019, an expression under the investor category was filed...