LCRO 88/2018 MC v OT (24 December 2018) [pdf, 225 KB]
...(a) had “fobbed off” his complaints; (b) failed to properly consider the documents provided; and (c) failed in its decision to acknowledge that Mr OT was wrong to pursue the matter in the Disputes Tribunal. [26] By way of outcome, Mr MC requests that the matter be properly investigated, that the amount charged present as consistent with the time spent, and that Mr OT be sanctioned for commencing proceedings in the Disputes Tribunal. [27] Mr OT was invited to comment on Mr MC...