[2013] NZEmpC 97 Transpacific Industries v Harris and Green [pdf, 238 KB]
...it. [26] We agree with Mr Harrison that cl 7.1 is ambiguous, not only when read in isolation but, more particularly, when read in the context of other relevant provisions in the agreement. It is not insignificant that the plaintiff’s request to the Court to modify cl 7.1 addresses some of those ambiguities. [27] Although, analysed sentence by sentence, it is possible to say, as the plaintiff would have it, that the first two sentences are non-operative, background or co...