Search Results

1. Nukutere Lands Trust v Trustees of Whitikau A1 – Opape 28 (2013) 70 Waiariki MB 272 (70 WAR 272) [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   70 Waiariki MB 272 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20030002687 A20050004880 A20050008626 UNDER Sections 9 and 326B, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Opape 28 (Whitikau A1) - Land Access BETWEEN NUKUTERE LANDS TRUST Applicant AND TRUSTEES OF WHITIKAU A1 First Respondent AND CJ PARKINSON Second Respondent Hearing: 24 March 2003, 81 Ōpōtiki MB 139-140 29 May 2003, 81 Ō

2. Edwards – Whakatōhea (2018) 183 Waiariki MB 169-194 (183 WAR 169) [pdf, 534 KB]

   ...Legislative provisions [29] Section 30 of the Act as originally enacted provided: 30 Power of Maori Land Court to give advice or make determination as to representatives of class or group of Maori- (1) The Maori Land Court may- (a) At the request of any court, commission, or tribunal, supply advice, in relation to any proceedings before that court, commission, or tribunal, as to the persons who, for the purposes of those proceedings, are the most appropriate representatives...

3. E2 Fiona Knox Corporate Options Analysis and Engagement EIC Applicant [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...the other relating to establishing a new facility (the Fishing and Ferry Industry Relocation Facility) (FFIRF) for the relocation of the Auckland fishing fleet, Sanford Limited (Sanford) and Sealink Travel Group Limited (Sealink). At Panuku’s request the applications were publicly notified. 205 submissions were received on the Wynyard Basin application, and 78 submissions on the FFIRF application. 4.22 The Crown, Panuku and ETNZ carried out further investigation of a land-bas...

4. 2021-02-19 Tom de Pelsemaeker - Reply - Planning - Recommended decisions on submissions (19 Feb 2021) [pdf, 2 MB]

   Provision ORC submission Number Submitter ID Submission Point ID Further Submitter ID Name Support / Oppose Decision requested (see submission for reasons) Officer recommendation All Plan Change 7 70013 70013.01 Aepurist International Not stated An efficient, effective and fair regulatory framework that provides for greater security for the Otago Region and horticulture An Objective, Policies and methods for an interim framework that provides for longer term (20 year) r

5. Tom De Pelsemaeker - ORC Final Evidence-in-Reply - Recommended Decisions on Submissions (25 June 2021) [pdf, 2 MB]

   Provision ORC submission Number Submitter ID Submission Point ID Further Submitter ID Name Support / Oppose Decision requested (see submission for reasons) Officer recommendation All Plan Change 7 70013 70013.01 Aepurist International Not stated An efficient, effective and fair regulatory framework that provides for greater security for the Otago Region and horticulture An Objective, Policies and methods for an interim framework that provides for longer term (20 year) r

6. [2015] NZEmpC 234 2015 AFT v BCM [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...over an extended period of time. There are two reasons for these unusual circumstances. The first is that the applicant is unrepresented and an unusual degree of leniency has been allowed to him to lodge proceedings that are not in the required formats. The second is that the applicant now lives and works outside New Zealand and in circumstances in which it is difficult and time-consuming both to put together those pleadings and to have affidavits sworn any more than very infrequ...

7. Biel v Hall - Opepe Farm Trust [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 535 (2011 APPEAL 535) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...accountant, when it was not produced in evidence and Mr Wilson was not called? Section 73, Trustee Act 1956 (q) Finding that the appellants acted unreasonably? [13] The appellants submitted that they have committed no breaches of trust and performed their own duties and exercised their own powers properly. They have therefore acted prudently, and they claim there were no grounds for them to be removed. They ask that this Court quash Judge Harvey‟s decisions of 29 October 201...

8. Williams v Trustees of Parahirahi C1 (2005) 37 Kaikohe MB 212 (37 KH 212) [pdf, 6.5 MB]

   ...the application are recorded in full below as: I. At the AGM held on 3 May 2003, the treasurer produced the "AGM Financial Report" a copy of which is annexed to an Affidavit by Mere Martin dated 09 July 2003. The Affidavit refers to the requests made on . behalf of beneficiaries for further information. None had been provided. 2. We require clarification of the infOimation provided In the "Financial Report"; • There is no statement, of assets owned by the Trust...

9. Lethbridge v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) & Fenton, Fenton v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) & Lethbridge [2018] NZREADT 58 [pdf, 506 KB]

   ...He also alleged that he lacked capacity to enter into the Agreement. 2.4 Mr Fenton subsequently failed to settle the purchase and provide vacant possession, resulting in the purchasers filing proceedings in the High Court, and specific performance of the Agreement being ordered in December 2016. 2.5 In April 2017, Mr Fenton made a number of complaints to the Authority regarding Ms Lethbridge’s conduct in the course of the transaction, including that Ms Lethbridge: (a) Mar...

10. [2022] NZEmpC 171 Alkazaz v Deloitte (No. 3) Ltd [pdf, 356 KB]

    ...third parties. He says that in mid-2017 he received a call from Mr Speers asking about Mr AlKazaz’s duties while he was employed by DeloitteAsparona. The conversation was followed up with an email from Mr Speers to Mr Rosser reiterating the request for comment and attaching a series of CVs received by Enterprise IT from Mr AlKazaz leading up to his employment. Mr Rosser says he told Mr Speers that he did not think he could help him. He says that on both occasions he spoke to...