Search Results

1. Tom De Pelsemaeker - ORC Final Evidence-in-Reply - Recommended Decisions on Submissions (25 June 2021) [pdf, 2 MB]

   Provision ORC submission Number Submitter ID Submission Point ID Further Submitter ID Name Support / Oppose Decision requested (see submission for reasons) Officer recommendation All Plan Change 7 70013 70013.01 Aepurist International Not stated An efficient, effective and fair regulatory framework that provides for greater security for the Otago Region and horticulture An Objective, Policies and methods for an interim framework that provides for longer term (20 year) r

2. [2023] NZEnvC 170 Liquigas Limited v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...orders that: (1) the appeal is allowed to the extent that Dunedin City Council is to amend the provisions of the proposed Dunedin City Second Generation District Plan as set out in Appendi"'{ 1, attached to and LIQUIGAS LTD V DCC 2 forming part of this order; (2) appeals by BP Oil New Zealand Limited and Others (DCC Reference numbers 347, 348 and 350), Federated Farmers of New Zealand Incorporated (DCC Reference number 345), Fonterra Limited (DCC Reference number 17...

3. E2 Fiona Knox Corporate Options Analysis and Engagement EIC Applicant [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...the other relating to establishing a new facility (the Fishing and Ferry Industry Relocation Facility) (FFIRF) for the relocation of the Auckland fishing fleet, Sanford Limited (Sanford) and Sealink Travel Group Limited (Sealink). At Panuku’s request the applications were publicly notified. 205 submissions were received on the Wynyard Basin application, and 78 submissions on the FFIRF application. 4.22 The Crown, Panuku and ETNZ carried out further investigation of a land-bas...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 234 2015 AFT v BCM [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...over an extended period of time. There are two reasons for these unusual circumstances. The first is that the applicant is unrepresented and an unusual degree of leniency has been allowed to him to lodge proceedings that are not in the required formats. The second is that the applicant now lives and works outside New Zealand and in circumstances in which it is difficult and time-consuming both to put together those pleadings and to have affidavits sworn any more than very infrequ...

5. Biel v Hall - Opepe Farm Trust [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 535 (2011 APPEAL 535) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...accountant, when it was not produced in evidence and Mr Wilson was not called? Section 73, Trustee Act 1956 (q) Finding that the appellants acted unreasonably? [13] The appellants submitted that they have committed no breaches of trust and performed their own duties and exercised their own powers properly. They have therefore acted prudently, and they claim there were no grounds for them to be removed. They ask that this Court quash Judge Harvey‟s decisions of 29 October 201...

6. Williams v Trustees of Parahirahi C1 (2005) 37 Kaikohe MB 212 (37 KH 212) [pdf, 6.5 MB]

   ...the application are recorded in full below as: I. At the AGM held on 3 May 2003, the treasurer produced the "AGM Financial Report" a copy of which is annexed to an Affidavit by Mere Martin dated 09 July 2003. The Affidavit refers to the requests made on . behalf of beneficiaries for further information. None had been provided. 2. We require clarification of the infOimation provided In the "Financial Report"; • There is no statement, of assets owned by the Trust...

7. Lethbridge v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) & Fenton, Fenton v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) & Lethbridge [2018] NZREADT 58 [pdf, 506 KB]

   ...He also alleged that he lacked capacity to enter into the Agreement. 2.4 Mr Fenton subsequently failed to settle the purchase and provide vacant possession, resulting in the purchasers filing proceedings in the High Court, and specific performance of the Agreement being ordered in December 2016. 2.5 In April 2017, Mr Fenton made a number of complaints to the Authority regarding Ms Lethbridge’s conduct in the course of the transaction, including that Ms Lethbridge: (a) Mar...

8. [2022] NZEmpC 171 Alkazaz v Deloitte (No. 3) Ltd [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...third parties. He says that in mid-2017 he received a call from Mr Speers asking about Mr AlKazaz’s duties while he was employed by DeloitteAsparona. The conversation was followed up with an email from Mr Speers to Mr Rosser reiterating the request for comment and attaching a series of CVs received by Enterprise IT from Mr AlKazaz leading up to his employment. Mr Rosser says he told Mr Speers that he did not think he could help him. He says that on both occasions he spoke to...

9. [2024] NZEnvC 043 Barclay Management (2013) Ltd v City Rail Link Limited [pdf, 378 KB]

   ...schedule of directly affected parties (attached to each notice of requirement) should be referred to for the actual area of land required. [14] Barclay’s hotel is not within the designated land, but its legal access is to Albert Street, which forms part of the designated area. [15] Since the Designations were confirmed, several amendments have been made to the designations and conditions. Changes were confirmed in January 2017 to accommodate variations to works relating to th...

10. LCRO 18/2021 MB v RP and ND (14 October 2022) [pdf, 265 KB]

    ...the manner required by the Trustee Act. Review on the papers [30] This review has been undertaken on the papers pursuant to s 206(2) of the Act, which allows a Legal Complaints Review Officer (LCRO) to conduct the review on the basis of all information available if the LCRO considers that the review can be adequately determined in the absence of the parties. 6 [31] I record that having carefully read the complaint, the response to the complaint, the Committee’s decisio...