Search Results

1. [2016] NZEmpC 2 Northern Amalgamated Workers Union of NZ v Golden Bay Cement [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...to work that is usually carried out by employees of the Company who are members of the Union AND Is directly or indirectly associated with cement manufacturing and/or dispatching and/or maintenance of production equipment AND is performed by employees who are based at Portland Works, Portland Quarry or Wilsonville Quarry. [7] Clause 24, which is the provision allegedly conferring the preference (the highlighted words in particular), states: 24. SELECTION PROCESS AN...

2. [2016] NZEnvC 248 Northcote Point Heritage Preservation Society Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 5.9 MB]

   ...update of draft conditions was lodged by the Applicant on 4 November, pursuant to leave, dealing with the matters raised. [44] We turn now to record our reasons for finding that the draft conditions of consent were, with the small modifications requested, entirely appropriate and not subject to the legal difficulties alleged by the Appellant. [45] We consider that the prime difficulty with the Appellant's approach was that it seized upon and addressed individual conditions in i...

3. [2006] NZEmpC WC 10/06 Timmins v Asure New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...determined that Mr Timmins was not a fit and proper person to hold a meat inspector’s licence. [45] After taking legal advice, Mr Timmins decided to revive his earlier personal grievance. His new solicitor wrote to ASURE on 25 February 2002 requesting information which was sent on 28 February 2002. On 16 April 2002 Mr Timmins’s solicitor wrote advising that Mr Timmins’s earlier personal grievance claim was being revived and an amended statement of problem would be filed....

4. Cycle-5-Methodology-Report-V1.0-FINAL.pdf [pdf, 5 MB]

   ...incorporating address files 22 3. Questionnaire design 24 Introduction 24 Mode of interviewing 24 Computer-assisted video interviewing 25 The questionnaire 26 Selection of incidents 28 Selection of incident scenarios 28 Individual and cluster victim forms 29 Offence codes 29 Victim definition 29 In-scope NZCVS offences 30 Data linking 31 4. Module development and testing 33 Overview 33 CAPI / CASI programming and testing 33 Programmed checks 34 Logic checks 34 Range checks 3...

5. NZCVS Cycle 4 2020-21 Methodology Report [pdf, 5.1 MB]

   ...21 Respondents 22 Process for incorporating address files 22 3. Questionnaire design 24 Introduction 24 Mode of interviewing 24 The questionnaire 26 Selection of incidents 28 Selection of incident scenarios 28 Individual and cluster victim forms 29 Offence codes 29 Victim definition 29 In-scope NZCVS offences 29 Data linking 31 4. Module development and testing 32 Overview 32 Cognitive testing 32 CAPI / CASI programming and testing 33 Programmed checks 33 Logic checks 34 R...

6. NZCVS Methodology Report Cycle 2 (2019) [pdf, 4.9 MB]

   ...incorporating address files 22 3. Questionnaire, incident selection and automated offence coding 24 Introduction 24 Mode of interviewing 24 The questionnaire 26 Selection of incidents 28 Selection of incident scenarios 28 Individual and cluster victim forms 28 Offence codes 29 Victim definition 29 In-scope NZCVS offences 29 Automated offence coding 31 Data linking 31 4. Questionnaire development and testing 33 Overview 33 Stakeholder consultation 33 Questionnaire design 34 Co...

7. Greensmith v Auckland Council [2025] NZHRRT 24 [pdf, 372 KB]

   ...HEARING: 29 November 2024 and 2 December 2024 DATE OF LAST SUBMISSIONS: 11 February 2025 for defendant 25 February 2025 for plaintiff DATE OF DECISION: 18 July 2025 2 [1] In September 2016 Ms Greensmith made an information privacy request to Auckland Council (Council) for an independent report (Report) it had commissioned regarding matters concerning properties she co-owned with her husband. Council initially refused to provide Ms Greensmith the Report. However, over t...

8. Recommendations recap - issue 5 [pdf, 1 MB]

   Recommendations recap A summary of coronial recommendations and comments made between 1 October–31 March 2013 Issue 5 Published by the Ministry of Justice ISSN 2253-5152 Disclaimer This publication has been produced by the research counsel of the Office of the Chief Coroner. The best effort has been made to accurately summarise the circumstances, findings and recommendations made by the coroner in each case – despite this, these are not exact replications of coronial findings. T

9. Morgan v CAC 20003 [2014] NZREADT 14 [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...from the complainant urging a finding of misconduct. It is not appropriate for the complainant to have been urging any such finding, its role was simply to provide facts. Counsel for Mr Morgan objected to this process on repeated occasions and requested the PGGW submission, including Duncan Cotterill’s legal opinion, be struck from the record, however, the CAC did not respond to this request or even acknowledge the objection. It is submitted that by 24 allowing this mat...

10. Wikiriwhi v Walters - Oruanui 9 Block and Part Oruanui 10 Block, Lot 1 Deposited Plan 471989 and Lot 2 Deposited Plan 471989 (2020) 232 Waiariki MB 212 (232 WAR 212) [pdf, 382 KB]

    ...vendor was seeking as much as $1,600,000.00. After discussions with the bank, the trustees identified that the trust could only borrow $650,000.00. [3] There was an existing house on the property. Having visited the property, the trustees formed the view that the house was a liability and should be subdivided and sold off. As a result of the funding gap and the unwanted house, the trustees say that two of them approached another trustee, Tom Walters, and suggested he buy the hou...