Search Results

Search results for forms generator.

2846 items matching your search terms

  1. ENV-2016-AKL-000185 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited v Auckland Council (scope) [pdf, 9.1 MB]

    Notice of appeal to Environment Court against decision on proposed Auckland combined plan Dated: 16 September 2016 Before the Environment Court In the matter of: Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) - Appeal against decision on proposed Auckland combined plan – s 156(1) of the LGATPA – Topic 050 City Centre – Viaduct Harbour Precinct - rezoning Lighter Quay as Sub-Precinct

  2. Waitangi Tribunal - Part 2 Rangahaua Whānui District Auckland [pdf, 3.8 MB]

    ...includes 5274 blocks from the entire country, 4950 blocks when obvious duplications have been eliminated. Of these, 1182 blocks are in the sample region from South Auckland north. The blocks were given a running number from 1 to 5274 and this has formed the basic identifier for all blocks in the database. As subsequent blocks or subdivisions were located they were given the next available LINZ number as an identifier. The original list was compiled by adding batches of blocks from variou...

  3. [2006] NZEmpC AC 52/06 Simpsons Farms Ltd v Aberhart [pdf, 143 KB]

    SIMPSONS FARMS LTD V ABERHART AK AC 52/06 14 September 2006 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 52/06 ARC 12/06 ARC 13/06 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN SIMPSONS FARMS LIMITED Plaintiff in ARC12/06 and Defendant in ARC13/06 AND GEOFFREY IAN ABERHART Defendant in ARC12/06 and Plaintiff in ARC13/06 Hearing: 26 and 27 July 2006 (Heard at Hamilton) Appearances: Simon Menzies and Andrea Twadd

  4. [2023] NZREADT 17 - UM v REAA (26 July 2023) [pdf, 250 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2023] NZREADT 17 Reference No: READT 017/2022 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN UM Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 2103) First Respondent AND NED GOW Second Respondent AND SU Third Respondent Tribunal: D J Plunkett (Chair) G J Denley (Member) P N O’Connor (Member) Representation: The

  5. Chen v Gu-Chang [2013] NZIACDT 16 (19 March 2013) [pdf, 221 KB]

    ...employed by another company. He held a licence from 27 February 2009, so he was licensed throughout the time to which the complaint relates. [12] Mr Chen first contacted AGC in December 2009. At that time he was in New Zealand unlawfully; his former adviser had lodged an application for a permit under section 35A of the Immigration Act 1987 (“the 1987 Act”) and it had been declined. Mr Chen’s initial contact at AGC was with Ms Gu-Chang. 3 [13] Mr Chen entered i...

  6. Performance Improvement Framework (PIF) July 2012 [pdf, 506 KB]

    PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT FRAMEWORK Formal Review of the Ministry of Jus ce (MoJ) JULY 2012 State Services Commission, the Treasury and the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet Performance Improvement Framework Formal Review: Ministry of Jus ce State Services Commission, the Treasury, and the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet Wellington, New Zealand Published July 2012 ISBN 978-0-478-36173-5 Web address: www.ssc.govt.nz/pif Crown copyright 2012 Copyright/terms

  7. Regulatory Impact Statement Vulnerable childrens bill child harm prevention orders [pdf, 234 KB]

    ...for the year from 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012. These statistics yielded an estimate of 80 individuals who might be considered suitable for an order. These volumes are necessarily very approximate, since there is no reliable information on the precise number of individuals who present a risk that would be mitigated by the imposition of the proposed order. 2 Risk prediction is inherently uncertain, so that orders will inevitably be imposed on people who...

  8. [2021] NZACC 33 - McSherry v ACC (10 February 2021) [pdf, 241 KB]

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 33 ACR 167/19 ACR 235/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN STEVEN McSHERRY Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 9 October 2020 Held at: Christchurch/Otautahi Appearances: Mr McSherry in person Mr I Hunt for the responden

  9. Auckland Waikato and Eastern Fish and Game Councils [pdf, 504 KB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL- IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (“the Act”) AND an appeal under Clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan BETWEEN AUCKLAND/WAIKATO AND EASTERN FISH AND GAME COUNCILS Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF APPEAL Dated: 8 Jul

  10. Short v Stowers - Te Tumu Kaituna 14 Block [2020] Māori Appellate Court MB 141 (2020 APPEAL 141) [pdf, 274 KB]

    ...was not made clear whether that opposition was to the application under s 135 or under s 244 or both, and analysis of the opposition can lead to very different conclusions. The appellants were not properly informed of this opposition and had to request a copy of the schedule of opposition which, surprisingly, had only been provided by Court staff to respondent counsel. The appellants maintained that it was inappropriate for the Court to ignore the results of a properly run postal...