Search Results

1. Performance Improvement Framework (PIF) July 2012 [pdf, 506 KB]

   PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT FRAMEWORK Formal Review of the Ministry of Jus ce (MoJ) JULY 2012 State Services Commission, the Treasury and the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet Performance Improvement Framework Formal Review: Ministry of Jus ce State Services Commission, the Treasury, and the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet Wellington, New Zealand Published July 2012 ISBN 978-0-478-36173-5 Web address: www.ssc.govt.nz/pif Crown copyright 2012 Copyright/terms

2. Chen v Gu-Chang [2013] NZIACDT 16 (19 March 2013) [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...employed by another company. He held a licence from 27 February 2009, so he was licensed throughout the time to which the complaint relates. [12] Mr Chen first contacted AGC in December 2009. At that time he was in New Zealand unlawfully; his former adviser had lodged an application for a permit under section 35A of the Immigration Act 1987 (“the 1987 Act”) and it had been declined. Mr Chen’s initial contact at AGC was with Ms Gu-Chang. 3 [13] Mr Chen entered i...

3. Regulatory Impact Statement Vulnerable childrens bill child harm prevention orders [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...for the year from 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012. These statistics yielded an estimate of 80 individuals who might be considered suitable for an order. These volumes are necessarily very approximate, since there is no reliable information on the precise number of individuals who present a risk that would be mitigated by the imposition of the proposed order. 2 Risk prediction is inherently uncertain, so that orders will inevitably be imposed on people who...

4. [2021] NZACC 33 - McSherry v ACC (10 February 2021) [pdf, 241 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 33 ACR 167/19 ACR 235/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN STEVEN McSHERRY Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 9 October 2020 Held at: Christchurch/Otautahi Appearances: Mr McSherry in person Mr I Hunt for the responden

5. Auckland Waikato and Eastern Fish and Game Councils [pdf, 504 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL- IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (“the Act”) AND an appeal under Clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan BETWEEN AUCKLAND/WAIKATO AND EASTERN FISH AND GAME COUNCILS Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF APPEAL Dated: 8 Jul

6. Short v Stowers - Te Tumu Kaituna 14 Block [2020] Māori Appellate Court MB 141 (2020 APPEAL 141) [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...was not made clear whether that opposition was to the application under s 135 or under s 244 or both, and analysis of the opposition can lead to very different conclusions. The appellants were not properly informed of this opposition and had to request a copy of the schedule of opposition which, surprisingly, had only been provided by Court staff to respondent counsel. The appellants maintained that it was inappropriate for the Court to ignore the results of a properly run postal...

7. Auckland Standards Committee v Johnston [2011] NZLCDT 14 [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...already made firm and specific arrangements independently of the practitioner for an appropriate avenue for the lending or borrowing of money. (3) Practitioners are referred for further guidance, particularly in regard to the need for the fully informed consent of clients, to the judgment of the Privy Council in Clark Boyce v Mouat [1993] 3 NZLR 641. 6 (4) Nothing in paragraph 2(iv) of this rule shall require separate independent advice to be obtained.” “Solicit...

8. Cabinet Paper Reforming the Privacy Act 1993 [pdf, 360 KB]

   1 In confidence Office of the Minister of Justice Cabinet Social Policy Committee REFORMING THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 Proposal 1. This paper seeks Cabinet agreement to: 1.1. policy decisions for a new Privacy Bill; 1.2. increase funding for the Office of the Privacy Commissioner; and 1.3. the attached supplementary Government Response to the Law Commission’s review of the Privacy Act 1993. Executive summary 2. New Zealand’s privacy regime was established in the early 1

9. Complaints Assessment Committee (CAC 409) v Ganesh NZREADT 19 [pdf, 327 KB]

   ...and/or [b] acted with an actual or potential conflict of interest (in that his interest in the quick sale of the property in order to recover monies lent to Mogans to Gkamal could conflict with Gkamal’s interests as vendor), and did not obtain informed consent in writing to act despite the potential for conflict, in breach of r 6.1 of the Real Estate Agents Act (Professional Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2012 (“the Rules”); and/or [c] gave Mr Singh assurances that certain w...

10. Owen v Hauiti - Kiwinui A (2016) 57 Tairawhiti MB 70 (57 TRW 70) [pdf, 290 KB]

    ...Tairawhiti MB 182-186 (43 TRW 182-186) 57 Tairawhiti MB 80 [32] Counsel contends that the Court should have regard to the Māori Appellate Court decision of Tohu – Te Horo 2B2B2B Residue where the Court determined that the homestead formerly owned by Haami and Te Ani Tohu on Te Horo 2B2B2B block together with the skyline garage built by Matthew Tohu were the property of Sebastian Matthew Tohu. Counsel submits this case is persuasive and in favour of the Owen whānau as the...