Search Results

1. [2024] NZEnvC 115 Anderson Branch Creek Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 440 KB]

   ANDERSON BRANCH CREEK LIMITED v QLDC IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 115 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN ANDERSON BRANCH CREEK LIMITED (ENV-2022-CHC-051) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge K G Reid – sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Consent Dete

2. 2019 Directory of Official Information M-O [pdf, 417 KB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings M-O Author Version number Date About This is a living document; we endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz Ministerial Services Strategy, Governance & Finance mailto:official.correspondenc

3. ENV-2016-AKL-000274 Rockfield Trust v KiwiRail Holdings Limited [pdf, 15 MB]

   ...Proceedings You may be a party to the appeal if: a) you made a submission on the matter of this appeal; b) within 15 working days after the period for lodging a notice of appeal ends, you lodge a notice of your wish to be a party to the proceedings (in form 33) with the Environment Court and serve copies of your notice on the relevant local authority and the appellant; and c) within 20 working days after the period for lodging a notice of appeal ends, you serve copies of your notice...

4. [2017] NZEmpC 150 Prasad v LSG Sky Chefs Ltd [pdf, 492 KB]

   KAMLESH PRASAD v LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND REGISTRY [2017] NZEmpC 150 [29 November 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND REGISTRY [2017] NZEmpC 150 EMPC 253/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN KAMLESH PRASAD First Plaintiff AND LIUTOFAGA TULAI Second Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant AND SO

5. Waitangi Tribunal - District 11 Wairoa [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   ...\ I I I I r ··' •• · ! J ( I ( ) j I FOREWORD The research report that follows is one of a series of historical surveys commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal as part of its Rangahaua Whanui programme. In its present form. it has the status of a working paper: first release. It is published now so that claimants and other interested parties can be aware of its contents and, should they so wish, comment on them and add further information and insights. The pub...

6. Pou - Eru Moka and Te Owai Pou Whanau Trust (2013) 61 Taitokerau MB 247 (61 TTK 247) [pdf, 258 KB]

   61 Taitokerau MB 247 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20100012115 UNDER Section 231, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Eru Moka and Te Owai Pou Whānau Trust BETWEEN TE RAUTAU POU Applicant A20120007638 UNDER Sections 113 and 117, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Horo Himi Te Waihika Pou or Jim Pou BETWEEN IWINGARO SYLVIA COURTNEY RIRIPETI MIRA NORRIS Applican

7. [2014] NZEmpC 92 H v A Limited [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...final orders. [3] On 13 December 2013 the Authority made an interim non-publication order that would lapse at 3:00 pm on 20 January 2014. The Authority member concluded that this order “was appropriate to allow the applicant an opportunity to inform his family and to exercise his rights of appeal if a further non-publication order was sought”. 2 [4] The plaintiff took up the option identified in the Authority’s determination and filed a de novo challenge on 13 January 2014...

8. [2014] NZEmpC 92 H v A Ltd [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...final orders. [3] On 13 December 2013 the Authority made an interim non-publication order that would lapse at 3:00 pm on 20 January 2014. The Authority member concluded that this order “was appropriate to allow the applicant an opportunity to inform his family and to exercise his rights of appeal if a further non-publication order was sought”. 2 [4] The plaintiff took up the option identified in the Authority’s determination and filed a de novo challenge on 13 January 2014...

9. [2020] NZEnvC 189 Weston Lea Limited v Hamilton City Council [pdf, 10 MB]

   ...are reserved pending the final decision. REASONS Introduction [1] Weston Lea seek to develop land on the southern side of Hamilton and adjacent to the Waikato River (Amberfield Development). The land is currently utilised as a Dairy Farm and forms part of a wider rural unit zoned within the Hamilton District. 3 (2] The land has however been identified for future residential growth over many years and more formally recognised in structure plans. The opposite side of the Waikato...

10. Wickliffe v Pearce - Paengaroa North B4B and K Aggregated (2005) 289 Rotorua MB 236 (289 ROT 236) [pdf, 5.9 MB]

    ...communications strategy to improve the flow of infonnation between the governors and their stakeholders. r then ordered the Trustees to provide the Court with a monthly report of their activities pending release of this decision. Subsequently, the Trustees requested an infonnal directions conference, which was held before me on 21 December 2004. At that conference a number of procedural issues were discussed concerning the on-going business of the Trust and the Company. Background T...