2863 items matching your search terms
...within my area of expertise except 1 When referring to the submitters generally in my evidence, I have used the form Kāi Tahu, which is most commonly used by mana whenua in Otago. Page 5 34677655_1.docx where I state that I am relying on information provided by another party. I have not knowingly omitted to consider material facts known...
...within my area of expertise except 1 When referring to the submitters generally in my evidence, I have used the form Kāi Tahu, which is most commonly used by mana whenua in Otago. Page 5 34677706_1.docx where I state that I am relying on information provided by another party. I have not knowingly omitted to consider material facts known...
...Bay’s current character and values: Ø An OUTER BAY enclosed by the outer headlands at the mouth of Matiatia Bay whose coastal fringe retains a stronger sense of being substantially ‘natural’, or at least still dominated by natural landforms and its interaction with the sea, while most higher slopes and ridges combine regenerating native shrubland with pockets of open space and more ornamental planting (including stands of olives) interspersed with dwellings. Ø...
...to provide the Court with an updated set of conditions responding to the issues on the other conditions identified by the Court is this further interim decision no later than 27 November 2020. C. Having considered Panuku's responses on this requested information and updated conditions, the Court should then be in a position to reach a final decision on the outcome of this appeal. REASONS Introduction [1] This case concerns an appeal by Panuku Development Auckland Limited...
110 Tairawhiti MB 64 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE TAIRĀWHITI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Tairāwhiti District A20210011408 WĀHANGA Under Section 289, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Whatatuna 11 I WAENGA I A Between MARSHA WYLLIE Te Kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: Hearing 27 January 2022, 109 Tairawhiti MB 146-157 (Heard at Gisborne) Whakataunga: Judgment
.................................................................................. 15 3.3 Scale and significance of the proposal ........................................................................ 17 4.0 EVIDENCE BASE – RESEARCH, CONSULTATION, INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS UNDERTAKEN .......................................................... 20 4.1 Research, information and analysis ............................................................................ 20 5.0 EVALUATION OF THE OBJECT...
...Topics 043 & 044 Transport - parking ratio for all activities in Viaduct Harbour Precinct (including offices) except residential activities And: Viaduct Harbour Holdings Ltd Appellant And: Auckland Council Local Authority 2 Form 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL TO ENVIRONMENT COURT AGAINST DECISION ON PROPOSED AUCKLAND COMBINED PLAN Section 156(1), Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 1 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Ltd (VHHL) appeals against a deci...
...under section 279(1) of the Act, such order being by consent, rather than representing a decision or determination on the merits. The Court understands for present purposes that: (a) All parties to the proceedings have executed the memorandum requesting this order; and (b) All parties are satisfied that all matters proposed for the Court’s endorsement fall within the Court’s jurisdiction, and conform to the relevant requirements and objectives of the Act including, in particu...
..._______________________________________________________________ A: Under s279(1)(b) of the RMA,1 the Environment Court, by consent, orders that: (1) the following resource consents are granted subject to the conditions set out in Appendices A–D attached to and forming part of this determination: 1 Resource Management Act 1991. 2 (a) a discharge permit to discharge agricultural effluent to land from milking up to 640 cows and housing up to 840 cows in winter barns (AU...
...OF TRIBUNAL1 [1] Ms Wise is a former employee of the New Zealand Police (Police). Ms Wise was made redundant from the Police on 6 February 2015. After concluding her employment with the Police Ms Wise made a number of information privacy requests leading up to an information privacy request dated 19 June 2018 which is the subject of this claim. [2] Ms Wise did not receive a response to her information privacy request until 29 August 2019, which was after she had filed her claim...