2863 items matching your search terms
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 19 May 2025 Ref: OIA 120795 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Ministerial Advisory Group – Retail Crime Thank you for your email of 28 March 2025 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding the Ministerial Advisory Group (The MAG) – Retail Crime. On 30 April 2025, you were...
...Cantlon’s opinion, this does not mean that disputed information should be deleted, but rather that the client’s view of the disputed information should be taken into consideration before the information is used. [19.7] The Ministry has received two requests from Mr Rafiq under Principle 7 requesting the correction of personal information. On each occasion the Ministry has not been willing to correct that information in accordance with the request but has attached to the information...
...under duress. Legal framework [19] Settlements are not uncommon in the context of employment relationships. The Act sets out a number of provisions relating to them. Section 149 provides that where a problem is resolved, a mediator may (at the request of the parties) sign the agreed terms of settlement. Prior to signing the agreement, the mediator is required to explain the effect of s 149(3) to the parties and must be satisfied that, knowing the effects of that provision, the...
...Area, the access prohibition may not be required. 49 Such restriction measures can be incorporated into the Marina carpark traffic and parking management plan. 50 I have considered whether a review condition without any restriction imposed (as requested by the Applicant) would suffice. However, I consider it is prudent to implement a condition restricting the Marina traffic use from the outset, with scope for modification or removal at a later stage, in order to fully understand...
...objectives are to be achieved. Such evidence will be necessary in order to demonstrate that the condition is appropriate. 30. WML cannot establish that the management plan proposed will properly and reasonably address the potential adverse effects generated by not making provision for berth holder car parking in close proximity to the marina berths. In the absence of that evidence the condition is too uncertain in respect of the effects it is intended to address and the Court ought...
...c. For the purposes of this standard: i. The area to be cleared will be measured from stems at ground level; and ii. The time period will be measured as the total clearance over any three calendar years. d. Activities that contravene this performance standard are restricted discretionary activities. [9] The respondent opposed the making of enforcement orders other than the one to cease clearance works, on the following grounds: a) The vegetation clearance was permitted by Rule 10.
...planning witness, Mr Allen, said that in addition to the location of infrastructure service connections, the Standard requires Council to consider the functionality and operation of the service connections. He said that the Council will sometimes request information as to whether the services are ‘fit for purpose’ to ensure that the existing servicing infrastructure is operating in a manner that is avoiding the creation of adverse effects on the environment. [29] Later in que...
...1993. Repealing this Act is no small matter. The Act represents a historic and broadly- based consensus between Maori and the Crown as to how Maori land is to be owned, used, and governed, and how its retention is to be safeguarded for future generations. We use the word ‘historic’, for the passage of the Act in 1993 was the first time in New Zealand’s history that the Treaty partners had reached a broad, enduring consensus on these important matters. At issue is whenua Mao...
...Tribunal was an abuse of process as the Committee had made a final ruling on the matter that embraced the subject matter of the referral,1 and having determined to take no further action in respect of the complaint of which the WhatsApp message formed a part, it would be an abuse of process to relitigate the matter. (b) The Committee had delayed its inquiry “far too long”. (c) The Committee was bound by the 8 January 2020 decision of Review Officer Robert Hesketh, which had...
...Corporation seek confirmation from Mr Schweder that Mr Fong’s personal injuries are no longer the cause of his incapacity and more likely than not due to multilevel spondylosis that predated his accident on 6 May 2021. [39] The Corporation then requested an opinion from Mr Schweder which was difficult to obtain due to the pressures on his practice at the time. While Mr Schweder convened a telehealth consultation with Mr Fong and discussed treatment options, he did not provide a...