Search Results

1. [2019] NZEnvC 022 Fitzgerald v Kaikoura District Council [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...consent authority asbuilt plans of all new serves, prior to issuing the 224 certificate to demonstrate compliance with the above conditions. Archaeological Matters 25. Where during excavation or land disturbance, any archaeological artefact or human remains are accidentally discovered, work sha ll cease immediately and the consent holder must consult with a representative of Te Runanga 0 Kaikoura and Heritage New Zealand (and the Police in the case of human remains), to determine wh...

2. Rotorua District Council (Representation Arrangements) Bill [pdf, 320 KB]

   ...ZEALAND Published by Order of the House of Representatives – 2022 Section 19 – right to be free from discrimination 8. Section 19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds set out in the Human Rights Act 1993. 9. The key questions in assessing whether there is a limit on the right to freedom from discrimination are: 9.1 does the legislation draw a distinction on one of the prohibited grounds of discrimination under s 21 of...

3. 20220421-Section-7-Report-Rotorua-District-Council.pdf [pdf, 320 KB]

   ...ZEALAND Published by Order of the House of Representatives – 2022 Section 19 – right to be free from discrimination 8. Section 19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds set out in the Human Rights Act 1993. 9. The key questions in assessing whether there is a limit on the right to freedom from discrimination are: 9.1 does the legislation draw a distinction on one of the prohibited grounds of discrimination under s 21 of...

4. 08042025-Immigration-Fiscal-Sustainability-and-System-Integrity-Amendment-Bill.pdf [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...and association posed by the Bill are justified under the Bill of Rights Act. Section 19 – Freedom from discrimination 18. Section 19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds set out in the Human Rights Act 1993 (the Human Rights Act). Discrimination arises where two comparable groups of people are treated differently based on a prohibited ground of discrimination, to the material disadvantage of the person or group differentia...

5. Davis v Hussey & Ors (Strike Out) [2025] NZHRRT 28 [pdf, 194 KB]

   1 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT CLAIM1 1 This decision is to be cited as Davis v Hussey & Ors (Strike Out) [2025] NZHRRT 28. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2025] NZHRRT 28 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA Reference No. HRRT 031/2023 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN ARTEMIS INDIGO DELILAH DAVIS PLAINTIFF AND SARAH LESS HUSSEY FIRST DEFENDANT AND BATH STREET TAP ROOM LIMITED SECOND DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: J Foster, Deputy Chairp...

6. 2021-03-24 OWRUG - DOC v ORC (C28-2002) [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...user groups, water allocation committees and other water users to assist with the gathering of information that supports future management decisions. 15.9.1.2 The Otago Regional Council will encourage research to improve knowledge about the natural and human use values of Otago’s water resources. Principal reasons for adopting These methods ‘are adopted to assist with making decisions on resource consent applications, and for the monitoring and review of the Plan’s provisions. With many...

7. Kelly v Tall Poppies Education Limited [2024] NZHRRT 54 [pdf, 339 KB]

   ...PARTICULARS. (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON. DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 1 This decision is to be cited as Kelly v Tall Poppies Education Limited [2024] NZHRRT 54. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 54 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA REFERENCE NO. HRRT 051/2022 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN LEEANN KELLY PLAINTIFF AND TALL POPPIES EDUCATION LIMITED FIRST DEFENDANT AND AM...

8. E96 Phillip Ware - Contaminated Land & Groundwater - RE – Applicant [pdf, 9 MB]

   ...Compliance Monitoring – Central for certification that the RAP gives effect to the objectives in Condition 87 and complies with the requirements in Condition 88. This Plan 87 The objectives of the RAP are to: a) Minimise harm from any potential human exposure from contaminants; b) Manage environmental risk from contaminated material; and c) Identify any unknown contaminated material. Section 2.1 88 The RAP shall be in general accordance with the Draft Remediation Action Plan...

9. Proactive release - Prisoner Voting [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...10:16:34 s9(2)(g)(i) s9(2)(g)(i) RE LE AS ED B Y TH E MIN IS TE R OF JU ST IC E RE LE AS ED B Y TH E MIN IS TE R OF JU ST IC E 4 Impact on rehabilitation and reintegration 21. The Tribunal cited the submission of the Human Rights Commission that denying sentenced prisoners the right to vote loses an opportunity and means of teaching them about democratic and social values. 22. The Tribunal found that the disqualification is inconsistent with the p...

10. Morison v New Zealand Association of Counsellors [2024] NZHRRT 46 [pdf, 362 KB]

    ...to NZAC for a copy of all communications and documents sent to and from the counsellor in relation to her (Ms Morison’s) complaint. 1 This decision is to be cited as Morison v New Zealand Association of Counsellors [2024] NZHRRT 46. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 46 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA REFERENCE NO. HRRT 028/2020 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN BRIDGET MORISON PLAINTIFF AND NEW ZEALAND ASSOCIATION OF COUNSELLORS INCORPORATED DEFE...