Search Results

1. Tai Rakena v Corrections (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 19 [pdf, 84 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2018] NZHRRT 19 Reference No. HRRT 011/2017 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN MICHAEL TAI RAKENA PLAINTIFF AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Mr R K Musuku, Member Mr B K Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr M Tai Rakena in person Ms V McCall and Ms G Taylor for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the p...

2. BORA Māori Purposes Bill [pdf, 307 KB]

   ...the Bill of Rights Act. Our analysis of this issue is set out below. THE RIGHT TO BE FREE FROM DISCRIMINATION 5. Section 19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds set out in section 21 of the Human Rights Act 1993. These grounds include age, which means any age commencing with the age of 16 years, and race. 6. In our view, taking into account the various domestic and overseas judicial pronouncements as to the meaning of discrimin...

3. BORA Prohibition of Gang Insignia in Government Premises Bill [pdf, 292 KB]

   ...ACT Freedom of expression 5. Section 14 of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right to freedom of expression, which includes the freedom to seek, receive, and impart information and opinions of any kind and in any form. The right is as wide as human thought and imagination.[1] 6. Gang insignia can be considered a form of expression and may fall under the protection of s 14 of the Bill of Rights Act. Gang insignia is, however, at the lower end of protected expression as it is associate...

4. Family Court Rewrite Submission - Roger Payne [pdf, 116 KB]

   ...the entire Family Court. Tweaking legislation in the manner you are proposing is simply not going to fundamentally lower the cost structure and reduce the ridiculous delay scenarios . A major redesign of the whole system is required . Financial , Human Relationship and Communication Experts should be involved . The Wisdom of Grandparents is required . Lawyers and judges have had too much say in past Reviews . It is high time to allow wider knowledge to prevail . CASE STUDIES 4. In...

5. HRRT Statement of Reply (Privacy) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...___________________________________________________________________ Preferred contact option for this reply. Please choose one and give the details.  Email  Postal address Email address __________________________________________________________________________ THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL Statement of Reply When to use this form Use this form if you are named as a defendant in a ‘Statement of Claim’ under section 98 of the Privacy Act 2020 and wish to file a ‘Stat...

6. Enforcement of an access direction - reply (s104) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ..._______________________________________________________________________ Preferred contact option for this reply. Please choose one and give the details. Email Postal address Email address __________________________________________________________________________ THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL Enforcement of access direction - Reply When to use this form Use this form if you are named as a defendant in an application for an access order under section 104 of...

7. Appeal against Compliance Notice (s131) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ..._______________________________________________________________________ Preferred contact option for this appeal? Please choose one and give the details. Email Postal address Email address __________________________________________________________________________ THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL Appeal against compliance notice Before you continue Please tick to confirm the following: The Privacy Commissioner has issued a compliance notice to the agency; or...

8. Wiping historical homosexual convictions

   ...(indecency between males) Crimes Act 1961 section 142 (sodomy) Crimes Act 1961 section 146 (keeping place of resort for homosexual acts) Crimes Act 1961 section 153 (unnatural offence) Crimes Act 1908 but only for offences committed with any other male human being section 154 (attempt to commit unnatural offence) Crimes Act 1908 but only for offences attempted to be committed with or against any other male human being People with historical convictions are able to apply themselves, or someone...

   Located in:

   1. Criminal record check

9. [2011] NZEmpc 122 Chen v BancLogix Limited [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...in establishing the new Internet system for KVB. [6] Initially, Mr Chen reported to Mr Charles Cai, BancLogix’s managing director. Mr Cai, however, resigned in May 2008 and from then on Mr Boland and Ms Christine Booker, the defendant’s human resources manager, were tasked with providing oversight and direction to the three software developers still employed by BancLogix, namely Mr Chen, Mr Patrick Wei and Ms Kylie Zhou. They reported to Mr Liu who mainly worked out of the...

10. E50 Myfanwy Eaves - Historic Heritage - EIC - Council [pdf, 809 KB]

    ...does not do this. 8.12 The AUP definition of 'archaeological site' is aligned with the definition used in the Heritage NZPTA 201415. This alignment "fixes" the time of an archaeological site to pre-1900 places with evidence of human activity. This means discussion of archaeological sites can only refer to pre-1900 locations and excludes, in totality, the entire Application area (reclamation) and any reference to such places in other parts, such as the accidental...