4099 items matching your search terms
1 ` IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2017] NZHRRT 51 Reference No. HRRT 018/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN DAVID ANDREW O’HAGAN PLAINTIFF AND NEW ZEALAND POLICE DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Ms MA Roche, Co-Chairperson Ms DL Hart, Member Hon KL Shirley, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr DA O’Hagan in person Ms V McCall for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 28 Novem...
...contravene a number of rules in the Auckland Unitary Plan: Operative in Part (AUPOP), as described in greater detail below, and that these contraventions 5 cause or are likely to cause adverse effects on the environment, including risks to human health and risks to the environment. [8] The orders are sought on an urgent basis without notice to maintain the status quo in circumstances where the Council considers there are good grounds to believe that more unconsented dwellings ar...
...February 2018. Impact Summary: Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal – detailed design, prepared by the Ministry of Justice on 14 July 2018. These will be published at: https://www.justice.govt.nz/justice-sector-policy/constitutional-issues-and-human- rights/regulatory-impact-statements; and http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/informationreleases/ris 2.3.1. If so, did the RIA Team in the Treasury provide an independent opinion on the quality of any of these regulator...
...s 41 of the Act it extended the time limit prescribed by s 40. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Tucker v Real Estate Agents Authority (Application for Closed Hearing) [2019] NZHRRT 49] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2019] NZHRRT 49 2 [2] The claim will be heard at Auckland on Monday 4 November 2017. Two days have been set aside. The disputed facts being within a small compass only two witnesses are to give evidence, being...
...from Betty’s Empire Limited (Betty’s Empire) on 7 November 2018. She requested the shoes be sent to her work address at DJ4U in Mt Roskill, Auckland. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Ween v Betty’s Empire Ltd [2020] NZHRRT 48.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2020] NZHRRT 48 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] On the same day, a Betty’s Empire employee sent Ms Ween’s on-line order receipt to her employer. [3] Ms Ween complained to Betty’s Empire’s abou...
...the appeal in the IPT until 18 April 2018. The IPT advised him the following day that it was out of time. [12] The complainant and Mr Guich had a meeting on 29 May 2018. He apologised again for his mistake as to the deadline, attributing it to human error. Mr Guich offered a refund of the fee for the residence application, even though the error had concerned the appeal and not the application. He informed her of the procedure for complaints. Decision of the Tribunal [13] Th...
...Bill of Rights, that meaning shall be preferred to any other meaning. Section 128 of the Accident Compensation Act should be read in light of the NZBORA. (e) Support for the Court adopting a rights-based approach in this case is found in the Human Rights Act 1993 and in the United Nations Conventions that are applicable to this matter (the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1978; the Rights of the Child 1993; and the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2008)....
...DATE OF HEARING: 21 November 2024 DATE OF DECISION: 23 April 2025 REDACTED PUBLISHED DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 1 This decision is to be cited as WNO v Oranga Tamariki [2025] NZHRRT 13. Note publication restrictions. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2025] NZHRRT 13 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [1] In July 2022, Oranga Tamariki provided WNO with an extensive release of information that it held about her, from which two pages of information were reda...
...democratic society by: Establishing (or rather continuing) intelligence and security agencies Giving these agencies adequate and appropriate functions, powers and duties Ensuring that their functions are performed in accordance with New Zealand law, and human rights obligations recognised by New Zealand law, with integrity and professionalism, and in a manner that facilitates democratic oversight, and Ensuring the powers of the agencies are subject to institutional oversight and safeguards. T...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2018] NZHRRT 19 Reference No. HRRT 011/2017 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN MICHAEL TAI RAKENA PLAINTIFF AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Mr R K Musuku, Member Mr B K Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr M Tai Rakena in person Ms V McCall and Ms G Taylor for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the p...