Search Results

1. Appeal against Compliance Notice (s131) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ..._______________________________________________________________________ Preferred contact option for this appeal? Please choose one and give the details. Email Postal address Email address __________________________________________________________________________ THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL Appeal against compliance notice Before you continue Please tick to confirm the following: The Privacy Commissioner has issued a compliance notice to the agency; or...

2. Wiping historical homosexual convictions

   ...(indecency between males) Crimes Act 1961 section 142 (sodomy) Crimes Act 1961 section 146 (keeping place of resort for homosexual acts) Crimes Act 1961 section 153 (unnatural offence) Crimes Act 1908 but only for offences committed with any other male human being section 154 (attempt to commit unnatural offence) Crimes Act 1908 but only for offences attempted to be committed with or against any other male human being People with historical convictions are able to apply themselves, or someone...

   Located in:

   1. Criminal record check

3. [2011] NZEmpc 122 Chen v BancLogix Limited [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...in establishing the new Internet system for KVB. [6] Initially, Mr Chen reported to Mr Charles Cai, BancLogix’s managing director. Mr Cai, however, resigned in May 2008 and from then on Mr Boland and Ms Christine Booker, the defendant’s human resources manager, were tasked with providing oversight and direction to the three software developers still employed by BancLogix, namely Mr Chen, Mr Patrick Wei and Ms Kylie Zhou. They reported to Mr Liu who mainly worked out of the...

4. E50 Myfanwy Eaves - Historic Heritage - EIC - Council [pdf, 809 KB]

   ...does not do this. 8.12 The AUP definition of 'archaeological site' is aligned with the definition used in the Heritage NZPTA 201415. This alignment "fixes" the time of an archaeological site to pre-1900 places with evidence of human activity. This means discussion of archaeological sites can only refer to pre-1900 locations and excludes, in totality, the entire Application area (reclamation) and any reference to such places in other parts, such as the accidental...

5. E50 Myfanwy Eaves - Historic Heritage - EIC - Council V2 [pdf, 810 KB]

   ...does not do this. 8.12 The AUP definition of 'archaeological site' is aligned with the definition used in the Heritage NZPTA 201415. This alignment "fixes" the time of an archaeological site to pre-1900 places with evidence of human activity. This means discussion of archaeological sites can only refer to pre-1900 locations and excludes, in totality, the entire Application area (reclamation) and any reference to such places in other parts, such as the accidental...

6. E50 Myfanwy Eaves Historic Heritage EIC Council [pdf, 810 KB]

   ...does not do this. 8.12 The AUP definition of 'archaeological site' is aligned with the definition used in the Heritage NZPTA 201415. This alignment "fixes" the time of an archaeological site to pre-1900 places with evidence of human activity. This means discussion of archaeological sites can only refer to pre-1900 locations and excludes, in totality, the entire Application area (reclamation) and any reference to such places in other parts, such as the accidental...

7. Director of Proceedings v Radius Residential Care Ltd [2022] NZHRRT 29 [pdf, 615 KB]

   ...Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 16 August 2022 (REDACTED) DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 1 [This decision is to be cited as Director of Proceedings v Radius Residential Care Ltd [2022] NZHRRT 29. Note publication restrictions.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2022] NZHRRT 29 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [1] These proceedings under the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 15 July 2022. [2] Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parti...

8. Nelson Standards Committee v Downing and Reith [2022] NZLCDT 21 (27 June 2022) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...to damage to dignitary interests are complex and very important. Remedies scholars (and increasingly courts) rightly see this as a particularly important and developing area of the law, which invokes a recognition of the fundamental importance of human dignity as perhaps the legal value in the 21st century.10 [26] The Tribunal adopts the following principles as providing helpful guidance for compensatory awards under the Act. • There must be a causal connection between the action o...

9. Director of Proceedings v Health New Zealand [2024] NZHRRT 37 [pdf, 710 KB]

   ...DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 5 August 2024 (REDACTED) DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 1 This decision is to be cited as Director of Proceedings v Health New Zealand [2024] NZHRRT 37. Note publication restrictions. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 37 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [1] These proceedings under the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 26 March 2024. Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parties reso...

10. LR v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 109 [pdf, 286 KB]

    ...(b)-(d) of Schedule 1? (b) Did the Judge err in failing to commence the interpretive exercise pursuant to s 6 of the NZ Bill of Rights Act 1993 (NZBORA)? (c) Did the Judge err when he found he was constrained by s 4 of NZBORA and s21B(1) of the Human Rights Act in setting aside or otherwise varying the original review decision dated 22 August 2022? (d) Did the Judge err when he failed to consider section 5 in addition to s4 of NZBORA and in so doing so failed to consider if the li...