Search Results

Search results for human.

4047 items matching your search terms

  1. Appeal against access direction - reply (s105) [pdf, 224 KB]

    ...Surname Phone/mobile number _______________________________________________________________________ Preferred contact option for this reply. Please choose one and give the details. Email Postal address THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL Appeal against access direction - Reply When to use this form Use this form if you are named as a respondent in an appeal against an access direction under section 105 of the Privacy Act 2020 and you wish to fil

  2. Enforcement of Access Direction (s104) [pdf, 223 KB]

    ...of paper. If you are using a representative (a lawyer or an authorised person acting on your behalf), please give their details too. If your representative is not a lawyer, you need to give him or her the authority to act on your behalf. THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL Enforcement of access direction Before you continue Please tick to confirm the following: The Privacy Commissioner has issued an access direction against the agency. The agency has not complied with the access di...

  3. 2021-10-04 Minute - PC7 - Community Water Supplies - TAs [pdf, 495 KB]

    ...Authority; and (h) review conditions; and (i) compliance monitoring; and (j) the point and method of measurement and the method for transmitting recorded data to Council. 4 In this rule drinking water means water intended to be used for human consumption, including water intended to be used for food preparation, utensil washing, and oral or other personal hygiene. 5 Schedule X Community Water Supplies Infrastructure Approximate Location Central Otago District...

  4. Boyd v Legacy Church and Legacy Housing (Strike-Out) [2023] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 138 KB]

    ...Neither Legacy Church or Legacy Housing have responded to Ms Boyd’s claim nor have they participated in any way in this matter. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Boyd v Legacy Church and Legacy Housing (Strike-Out) [2023] NZHRRT 2.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2022] NZHRRT 2 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] Ms Boyd has however failed to progress her claim. Given this, the Tribunal must determine whether the claim has become an abuse of process and should be st...

  5. Overview for interpreters about common jurisdictions in the Courts and Tribunals [pdf, 184 KB]

    ...of the Māori Land Court is to provide a court service for owners of Māori land, their whānau and their hapū which not only promotes the retention and use of Māori land but also facilitates the occupation, development, and use of that land. Human Rights Review Tribunal This tribunal hears claims relating to breaches to the Human Rights Act 1993, Privacy At 2020, and the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994. Complaints must be made to the respective commissions before matter...

  6. BSA newsletter Mar 2021 v2 [pdf, 374 KB]

    ...Karak Harnessing behavioural science in public health campaigns to maintain ‘social distancing’ in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: key principles by Chris Bonell et al Who are we? Almost everything done within the Justice Sector involves human behaviour, whether it is requiring people to pay their fines, supporting people to stick to their parole conditions, or preventing crimes. We often expect people to respond predictably to laws or incentives without considering all th...

  7. Smith v Genesis Energy Limited (Strike-Out) [2023] NZHRRT 24 [pdf, 169 KB]

    ...his personal information without his authorisation, in breach of Information Privacy Principles (IPPs) 6 and 11 of the Privacy Act 2020. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Smith v Genesis Energy Limited (Strike-Out) [2023] NZHRRT 24] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2023] NZHRRT 24 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] Frank Energy deny Mr Smith’s claim and raise jurisdictional issues. [3] Since filing his statement of claim, Mr Smith has failed to engage with the Trib...

  8. BI v U Ltd [2022] NZDT 142 (5 August 2022) [pdf, 101 KB]

    ...his car was gone. 6. BI admitted that his statements differed and that was misleading and apologised profusely for doing so. He said this was to avoid extreme embarrassment in front of his employees. He says he made a mistake, and that is only human. 7. In his Police statement dated 12 April 2016, BI says: a. On 13th – 14th March 2016 I lent the car to a woman (S) that he had known for 6 months while she was visiting from [City]. She did not return it when she was supposed to....

  9. Thomas v Ministry of Social Development (Costs) [2025] NZHRRT 20 [pdf, 168 KB]

    ...Privacy Principles 1, 2 and 4. Damages of $8,000 were awarded to Mr Thomas for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to his feelings. 1 This decision is to be cited as Thomas v Ministry of Social Development (Costs) [2025] NZHRRT 20. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2025] NZHRRT 20 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA REFERENCE NO. HRRT 063/2017 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN PETER JOSEPH THOMAS PLAINTIFF AND MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT DEFENDANT A...

  10. 2019 Directory of Official Information A-C [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    ...problems within New Zealand have been widely adopted by many other countries world-wide. Animal Control Products has been a global leader in the supply of products and delivery methods for the eradication of rodents to restore biodiversity, protect human health or improve primary production. ACP’s rodenticides have been used on more than 200 islands across 20 countries. The company has a continued focus on diversification through sound science and product development. This focus...