Liu v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 409) & Parore [2018] NZREADT 7 [pdf, 244 KB]
...(given by way of Mr Parore’s submissions on penalty).6 [18] The Committee did not consider Mr Parore’s error to be indicative of any wider lack of knowledge of real estate process and protocols of the Act, rather a lapse of judgment and a human error. It assessed his conduct as being at the lower end of the scale of unsatisfactory conduct.7 [19] The Committee acknowledged that a finding of unsatisfactory conduct is itself a penalty, having regard to the Authority’s public...