4047 items matching your search terms
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2016] NZHRRT 28 Reference No. HRRT 035/2015 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN DEBORAH WAXMAN PLAINTIFF AND JITENDRA PAL DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms LJ Alaeinia, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Dr D Waxman in person Dr J Pal in person DATE OF HEARING: 30 and 31 May 2016 DATE OF DECISION: 11 August 2016 DECISION OF TRI...
...to be an issue, however, is the relative space left to hapū such as Ngāti Pu in a post-settlement environment to maintain and assert an independent voice. In one sense, this in an intensely practical question depending in large part upon the human and other resources available to the hapū and the extent to which it is unified. There are also important points of principle potentially at issue. Chief amongst these are the way in which whānau, hapū and iwi relate to each other and t...
...complaint being upheld without necessarily imposing a sanction, it follows it is not necessary to find a disciplinary sanction should be imposed to uphold a 7 complaint. However, it is important to recognise not every lapse or manifestation of human frailty should result in an adverse professional disciplinary finding. It follows there will be occasions when advisers are responsible for a lapse from acceptable standards; but still not justify upholding a disciplinary complaint....
...tried to reschedule the meeting. 4 [10.6] The Tribunal indicated (on the basis of the information Ms Lozano provided to the Authority) it believed Ms Lozano had been late to the meeting and the issue was no more than a minor example of human frailty. [10.7] Ms Lozano then remained silent and expected the Tribunal to act on the information she had supplied to the Authority. [10.8] Ms Lozano knew when she supplied the information to the Authority that it was misleading. Sh...
...complaint being upheld without necessarily imposing a sanction. It follows that it is not necessary to find that a disciplinary sanction should be imposed to uphold a complaint. It is important to recognise that not every lapse or manifestation of human frailty should result in an adverse professional disciplinary finding. There will be occasions when advisers are responsible for a lapse from acceptable standards, but that still does not justify upholding a disciplinary complaint. [...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2017] NZHRRT 12 Reference No. HRRT 061/2015 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN YIASOUMI YIASOUMI PLAINTIFF AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms WV Gilchrist, Member Hon KL Shirley, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr Y Yiasoumi in person Ms H Carrad for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 8 March 2017 DATE OF DECISION: 11 April...
...previous disciplinary history, and may therefore be entitled to some reduction in penalty, but submitted that remorse could not be considered as a mitigating factor. While noting that the defendant had entered into a settlement with Ms A through the Human Rights Commission, had made some partial admissions as to his conduct in the course of the present proceeding, and had expressed regret and embarrassment regarding some of his comments, Mr Hodge submitted that the defendant had co...
...all reasonable steps to avoid committing the offence, or • the act or omission constituting the offence took place in circumstances of an adverse event or emergency, and was necessary for the preservation, protection, or maintenance of animal or human life or for animal welfare purposes. Is the limit on the right to be presumed innocent justified? 47. Where a provision is found to limit a particular right or freedom, it may nevertheless be consistent with the Bill of Rights Act if...
...by outlining the factual background to the claim as asserted by the HNs. Background [5] At the time in question, an entity called “LV Employment Law Specialists” (LV) had a website advertising itself as “LV Employment Law Specialists and Human Resource practice”. The self-description included the statement that “As professional Employment Law Specialists (not lawyers) we represent a wide range of client issues”. [6] Mr FT’s name was at the foot of the page followed...
...Shadforth said the complaint, and the outcome had caused her significant personal difficulty. [6.7] She concluded her submission by contending that the Tribunal has attributed to her the personal characteristics of persons who committed crimes against humanity during the Holocaust, and said it was particularly distressing as her family were victims of the Holocaust. Ms Shadforth Rejected the opportunity to Attend an Oral Hearing [7] The Tribunal’s interim decision, for the reasons e...