Search Results

1. [2017] NZEnvC 150 Blueskin Energy Ltd v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 11 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Court: Hearing Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC 150 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN BLUESKIN ENERGY LIMITED (ENV-2016-CHC-047) Appellant AND DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J E Borthwick Environment Commissioner W R Howie Environment Commissioner D J Bunting at Dunedin on 27, 28, 29 and 30 June 2017 and 18,19 and 20 July 2017 (Site visits carried out 26 J

2. 2020-12-07 Statement of Evidence of Tom de Pelsemaeker on behalf of the ORC - Appendix C [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...ensure that it can continue to meet a multiplicity of needs without becoming degraded or depleted. These include the habitat needs of our first freshwater users, the indigenous fish, fowl and invertebrates, and the more recent demands created by human activities, such as the need for clean drinking water, recreation, hydroelectricity generation, and farm irrigation. The task of managing these needs and demands is challenging. One set of challenges relates to water quality. It requir...

3. 2019-10-01-MfE-Professor-Skeltons-Report.pdf [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   ...to ensure that it can continue to meet a multiplicity of needs without becoming degraded or depleted. These include the habitat needs of our first freshwater users, the indigenous fish, fowl and invertebrates, and the more recent demands created by human activities, such as the need for clean drinking water, recreation, hydroelectricity generation, and farm irrigation. The task of managing these needs and demands is challenging. One set of challenges relates to water quality. It require...

4. [2023] NZEnvC 003 Judgeford Environmental Society Incorporated v Wellington Regional Council [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...Holder shall notify GWRC, Te Rūnanga o Toa Rangatira Inc, and Taranaki Whānui (PNBST) (only if relevant to Fill Site 2 works) and Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga (Heritage New Zealand) as soon as possible, but within twenty-four hours. If human remains are found, the New Zealand Police shall also be contacted. The Consent Holder shall allow the above parties to inspect the site and in consultation with them, identify what needs to occur before work can resume. Notification mu...

5. 3_Draft-Conditions-revised-2022-11-27-Appendix-5-to-the-AEE-v2.pdf [pdf, 694 KB]

   ...putrescible, degradable or leachable components; b) hazardous substances; c) products or materials derived from hazardous waste treatment, hazardous waste stabilisation or hazardous waste disposal practices; d) materials that may present a risk to human health; e) liquid waste; and f) for the purpose of this Project, any archaeological material or from a wāhi tapu or site of cultural significance. Complaint For the purposes of Condition DCE3 and RCM2, a complaint may include more...

6. 05-Appendix-Five-Draft-conditions.pdf [pdf, 694 KB]

   ...putrescible, degradable or leachable components; b) hazardous substances; c) products or materials derived from hazardous waste treatment, hazardous waste stabilisation or hazardous waste disposal practices; d) materials that may present a risk to human health; e) liquid waste; and f) for the purpose of this Project, any archaeological material or from a wāhi tapu or site of cultural significance. Complaint For the purposes of Condition DCE3 and RCM2, a complaint may include more...

7. [2007] NZEmpC CC 7/07 Rooney Earthmoving Ltd v McTague and anor [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...must, logically, be prejudice or hardship occasioned by the delay and not attributable to the bringing of a challenge as of right within time. The respondents’ grounds of contended prejudice or hardship, even differentiated from understandable human disappointment, do not make that necessary distinction so that they are not factors favouring a refusal of leave. The case was an expensive one for the parties. Mr McTague deposes to the costs of the respondents in the Authority...

8. [2011] NZEmpC 108 Auckland District Health Board v Bierre [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...equipment. [23] Ms Bierre then signed the OHS consent form which stated: Recommendations arising from this assessment will be sent to your employer (ADHB). Only the information required by the workplace will be provided to your Manager and/or the Human Resources Consultant. [24] The OHS consent form also referred in the following terms to the Privacy Act 1993 and the Health Information Privacy Code 1994 (the HIPC): “Personal information is collected and stored under the guidel...

9. [2008] NZEmpC CC 13/08 ANZ National Bank Ltd v Svensson [pdf, 64 KB]

   ...(that is, over the course of 5 rather than 4 days per week). However, later that day, she told Ms Carroll that she did not want to change her hours and would be taking advice. [26] Ms Carroll referred the matter to Natalie Henry, the bank’s human resources consultant. Mrs Svensson’s representative, Brent Climo, advised Ms Henry by telephone that: 1. Mrs Svensson considered that the bank could not change her hours because it had agreed in the 2005 IEA that it would...

10. Wright v CAC 10056 & Woods [2011] NZREADT 21 [pdf, 169 KB]

    ...were confused about where the boundary was and did appear to discount any documentary evidence as to the boundary because it did not fit with where they believed the boundary was or they believed it was unreliable. [48] This does seem, from a human point of view, to be perfectly understandable. However, is Ms Wright responsible for this? Perhaps she could have done more in that she could have recorded in writing that the vendors had told her that not all of the grassed area was part...