Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 003 Judgeford Environmental Society Incorporated v Wellington Regional Council [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...Holder shall notify GWRC, Te Rūnanga o Toa Rangatira Inc, and Taranaki Whānui (PNBST) (only if relevant to Fill Site 2 works) and Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga (Heritage New Zealand) as soon as possible, but within twenty-four hours. If human remains are found, the New Zealand Police shall also be contacted. The Consent Holder shall allow the above parties to inspect the site and in consultation with them, identify what needs to occur before work can resume. Notification mu...

2. 3_Draft-Conditions-revised-2022-11-27-Appendix-5-to-the-AEE-v2.pdf [pdf, 694 KB]

   ...putrescible, degradable or leachable components; b) hazardous substances; c) products or materials derived from hazardous waste treatment, hazardous waste stabilisation or hazardous waste disposal practices; d) materials that may present a risk to human health; e) liquid waste; and f) for the purpose of this Project, any archaeological material or from a wāhi tapu or site of cultural significance. Complaint For the purposes of Condition DCE3 and RCM2, a complaint may include more...

3. 05-Appendix-Five-Draft-conditions.pdf [pdf, 694 KB]

   ...putrescible, degradable or leachable components; b) hazardous substances; c) products or materials derived from hazardous waste treatment, hazardous waste stabilisation or hazardous waste disposal practices; d) materials that may present a risk to human health; e) liquid waste; and f) for the purpose of this Project, any archaeological material or from a wāhi tapu or site of cultural significance. Complaint For the purposes of Condition DCE3 and RCM2, a complaint may include more...

4. Disability-and-victimisation-final-report.pdf [pdf, 880 KB]

   michael@kaitiakiresearch.com +64 (0)27-511-1993 prepared for Ministry of Justice by Michael Roguski, Karen McBride-Henry, Gretchen Good, Tara Officer, Nicola Atwool, and Debbie Hager 13 June 2024 Understanding the Lived Experiences of Disabled People Who Have Been Victims of Crime mailto:michael@kaitiakiresearch.com CONTENTS CONTENTS ............................................................................................

5. [2007] NZEmpC CC 7/07 Rooney Earthmoving Ltd v McTague and anor [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...must, logically, be prejudice or hardship occasioned by the delay and not attributable to the bringing of a challenge as of right within time. The respondents’ grounds of contended prejudice or hardship, even differentiated from understandable human disappointment, do not make that necessary distinction so that they are not factors favouring a refusal of leave. The case was an expensive one for the parties. Mr McTague deposes to the costs of the respondents in the Authority...

6. [2011] NZEmpC 108 Auckland District Health Board v Bierre [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...equipment. [23] Ms Bierre then signed the OHS consent form which stated: Recommendations arising from this assessment will be sent to your employer (ADHB). Only the information required by the workplace will be provided to your Manager and/or the Human Resources Consultant. [24] The OHS consent form also referred in the following terms to the Privacy Act 1993 and the Health Information Privacy Code 1994 (the HIPC): “Personal information is collected and stored under the guidel...

7. [2008] NZEmpC CC 13/08 ANZ National Bank Ltd v Svensson [pdf, 64 KB]

   ...(that is, over the course of 5 rather than 4 days per week). However, later that day, she told Ms Carroll that she did not want to change her hours and would be taking advice. [26] Ms Carroll referred the matter to Natalie Henry, the bank’s human resources consultant. Mrs Svensson’s representative, Brent Climo, advised Ms Henry by telephone that: 1. Mrs Svensson considered that the bank could not change her hours because it had agreed in the 2005 IEA that it would...

8. Wright v CAC 10056 & Woods [2011] NZREADT 21 [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...were confused about where the boundary was and did appear to discount any documentary evidence as to the boundary because it did not fit with where they believed the boundary was or they believed it was unreliable. [48] This does seem, from a human point of view, to be perfectly understandable. However, is Ms Wright responsible for this? Perhaps she could have done more in that she could have recorded in writing that the vendors had told her that not all of the grassed area was part...

9. Cabinet proposal to establish a supervision regime for offenders deported to New Zealand [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...breach of conditions 1.8 3.9 4.2 3.4 2.5 15.8 Legal aid for breach of conditions 34.1 80.5 83.6 68.2 49.6 316 Imprisonment for breach of conditions 33.0 66.1 77.1 55.1 44 275.3 Total 901.2 1,748.9 1,848.4 1,542.7 1,195.9 7,237.1 9 Human rights 50. The proposals raise issues with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, in particular section 26(2) which affirms that no one who has been finally acquitted or convicted of, or pardoned for, an offence shall be tried or pu...

10. Potae v ACC [2014] NZACA 5 [pdf, 65 KB]

    ...effects and injuries which followed. If one looks at the matter without subtlety I think the only conclusion that can be made is that this was injury by accident, an unexpected untoward mishap. The fact that it came from a stoppage in an essential human activity does not alter the real effect, the real meaning of the events and occurrence.” Interim directions [26] I do not intend to pre-empt ACC’s consideration of the claim or limit the evidence it should consider, but...