Search Results

1. MacGregor v Craig (Rescission of Confidentiality Orders) [2016] NZHRRT 23 [pdf, 225 KB]

   1 (1) NOTE ALL NON-PUBLICATION ORDERS MADE BY THE TRIBUNAL HAVE BEEN RESCINDED AND NO LONGER APPLY (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2016] NZHRRT 23 Reference No. HRRT 040/2015 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN RACHEL MACGREGOR PLAINTIFF AND COLIN CRAIG DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairpers...

2. Ashworth v Kent (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 55 [pdf, 475 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2018] NZHRRT 55 Reference No. HRRT 026/2018 UNDER SECTION 51 OF THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN NICOLA JAN ASHWORTH PLAINTIFF AND DAVID GREGORY KENT FIRST DEFENDANT AND FENDALTON EYE CLINIC LIMITED SECOND DEFENDANT (discontinued) AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms K Anderson, Member Ms GJ Goodwin, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr...

3. Neemia v International Waste Ltd [2021] NZHRRT 32 [pdf, 182 KB]

   Reference No. HRRT 088/2016 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN SAMOA NEEMIA PLAINTIFF AND INTERNATIONAL WASTE LIMITED DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms J Foster, Deputy Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey MNZM, Member Mr RK Musuku, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms O Woodroffe for plaintiff Mr T Simmonds and Ms O Cann for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 30 September, 1, 2, 3 and 4 October 2019 DATE OF DECISION: 19 July 2021...

4. [2020] NZEnvC 204 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 4 MB]

   ...already present in the Tamaki Makaurau / Auckland, but the following programmes aim to slow their further spread, and therefore impact, within the region. Many marine pest organisms attach themselves to hard surfaces, which means they can be spread by human movement of vessels and other craft, aquaculture equipment, and other equipment and goods including scuba and fishing gear. They can also be captured in bilge, ballast or holding tank waters and spread to other areas when such waters...

5. Kiely v Attorney-General (Order Removing Proceedings to High Court) [2017] NZHRRT 36 [pdf, 93 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2017] NZHRRT 36 Reference No. HRRT 026/2017 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN CATHERINE KIELY PLAINTIFF AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey MNZM, Member Hon KL Shirley, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr SRG Judd for plaintiff Mr P Rishworth QC and Mr M McKillop for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the pa...

6. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Schubach [2015] NZHRRT 4 [pdf, 152 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2015] NZHRRT 4 Reference No. HRRT 034/2013 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND JUERGEN SCHUBACH DEFENDANT AT CHRISTCHURCH BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms WV Gilchrist, Member Ms ST Scott, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr D Peirse for plaintiff Mr J Schubach in person (no appearance) DATE OF HEARING: 10 and 11 November 20...

7. [2011] NZEmpC 153 Broughton v Microsoft NZ Ltd 3rd interlocutory [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...defendant to confirm by memorandum into which of two categories these documents dealing with what is known as “Timeline Project Prius” fell. [2] The first category consisted of a strategy document sent by Ms Doherty to Ms Nash (Microsoft’s Legal Human Resources Director in Singapore) after legal advice had been taken about the documents. In this category they could not, individually or collectively, attract a claim for legal or professional privilege....

8. NOP & TUV v Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment (Costs) [2014] NZHRRT 36 [pdf, 43 KB]

   1 (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE PLAINTIFFS AND OF THEIR CHILDREN (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 36 Reference No. HRRT 025/2008 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN NOP AND TUV PLAINTIFFS AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE, MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT DEFEN...

9. Re Dunstan (Rejection of Statements of Claim No. 2) [2024] NZHRRT 16 [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...requires a plaintiff to state the basis on which the plaintiff says the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear the claim. The form also requires a plaintiff to attach the relevant certificates or notices (from the Privacy Commissioner or the Director of Human Rights Proceedings) confirming the Tribunal’s jurisdiction. 1This decision is to be cited as Re Dunstan (Rejection of Statements of Claim No. 2) [2024] NZHRRT 16. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 16 I TE TARAIP...

10. Taylor v Corrections (Jurisdiction) [2019] NZHRRT 17 [pdf, 250 KB]

    1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2019] NZHRRT 17 Reference No. HRRT 010/2015 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN ARTHUR WILLIAM TAYLOR FIRST PLAINTIFF AND BRIAN DAMIAN HUNTER SECOND PLAINTIFF (struck out) AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey MNZM, Member Mr RK Musuku, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr AW Taylor in person...