3994 items matching your search terms
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 6 April 2023 Our ref: OIA 102423 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Independent Police Conduct Authority Thank you for your email of 10 February 2023, in which you requested, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information about the Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA). Specifically, you reque
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 6 April 2023 Our ref: OIA 102423 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Independent Police Conduct Authority Thank you for your email of 10 February 2023, in which you requested, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information about the Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA). Specifically, you reque
...7 1.3 Quality framework overview 8 1.4 Enabling legislation i The interpreter service aims to achieve equal access to justice as envisaged in: • Te Tiriti o Waitangi • New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 • Human Rights Act 1993 • Universal Declaration of Human Rights • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights • United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) • United Nations Convention of the R...
...and other impacted communities; • ensure the AML/CFT regime produces the necessary type and quality of information to support other frameworks and to combat money laundering, terrorism financing, and serious and organised crime; • ensure that human rights and privacy considerations are addressed and that intrusions on personal rights and freedoms are no more than necessary; and • support efficient long-term administration of the regime. Ultimately, we see this review as start...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Counsel: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 02-4- of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-000176) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent R Peters and R Bannan R Dexter and A Modrow N Smith P Lange L Whiley s 27 4 parties Envir
...representatives. The Ministry will continue to work closely with hapū and iwi so their priorities are considered. Legislative Implications and Regulatory Impact Analysis 34. There are no regulatory or legislative implications arising from this paper. Human Rights 35. The proposal has no direct human rights implications under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 or the Human Rights Act 1993. The Ministry’s approach is consistent with the Treaty of Waitangi and demonstrates a co...
...and he appeared to have a clear recollection of the meeting. [45] On the particular issue of whether copies of the written statements made by Mr Fisher and Mr Columb were provided at the meeting, it is also far more consistent with logic and human nature that they were. Mr Foster had gone to the trouble of having the two men prepare the statements and sign them prior to the meeting. The obvious inference is that he did so for the purpose of making them available to Mr Hamilton....
...the attendances at various meetings were not provided. On 31 January, at a meeting involving the plaintiff, Sharon Adlam, the site manager of Dynea’s Nelson premises, and Cleve Reed, the New Plymouth site manager who was also responsible for human resources and health and safety issues throughout Dynea’s New Zealand operations, the plaintiff was told he was demoted with a reduction in salary and was given a final written warning. [9] Following the 31 January meeting Mr Climo...
...turn, responsible to the Registrar of Unitec, Rebecca Ewert. Others who dealt with these matters at Unitec included the conciliator, Glenda Grant, and Bev Cullen who was both the co-ordinator of Unitec’s Harassment Policy and acting human resources manager at the relevant time. [13] After making contact with the conciliator, Ms Grant, Ms Henderson’s concerns about Mrs Nummy were dealt with informally and in a low key manner for some time. Ms Henderson’s dealings...
...client after she took up the business development position. [25] The plaintiffs drew a distinction between the role of consultants and the Branch Manager and Business Development roles they held. The evidence of Kelly Services’ Director of Human Resources, Ms Wallace, was that the expectation placed on consultants to develop relationships with clients from the company’s client base extends to more senior roles. Her evidence was that Ms Pottinger and Ms Carew had access to a...