Search Results

1. AMLCFT_Release_Pack_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 7.5 MB]

   ...are being sought, a RIS is not required. Climate Implications of Policy Assessment 77 There are no climate implications associated with this policy. Population Implications 78 There are no populations implications associated with this policy. Human Rights 79 There are no human rights implications associated with the policy agreed to in this paper. Any implications of the individual initiatives will be considered in further Cabinet papers where agreement to policy is sought. Us...

2. [2019] NZEnvC 112 Golf 2012 Limited v Thames Coromandel District Council [pdf, 24 MB]

   /BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC J ( 2.. of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal under Clause 14 of Schedule 1 to the Act GOLF (2012) LIMITED (ENV-2016-AKL-079) Appellant THAMES-COROMANDEL DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent HOLES 1 AND 2 GROUP MATARANGIRATEPAYERS ASSOCIATION IN CORPORA TED NEW Z

3. Restorative justice: Practice standards for family violence cases 2019 [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   PRACTICE STANDARDS FOR FAMILY VIOLENCE CASES RESTORATIVE JUSTICE He aha te mea nui o tea ao? He tangata, he tangata, he tangata What is the most important thing in the world? It is people, it is people, it is people 3 CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION .......................

4. [2020] NZEnvC 211 Panuku Development Auckland Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...Discharge permit under section 15 of the RMA . The above resource consents are required for the following reasons: Land use consent (section 9(1}) - LUC60303721 National Environmental Standard for assessing and managing contaminants in soil to protect human health Regulation 1 0 (a) Restricted discretionary activity resource consent is required under the N ES: CS regulation 10( 1) for work associated with potentially contaminated soil. Land use consent (section 9(3)) - LUC60303...

5. 19.-Evidence-of-Mr-Nick-Goldwater-Terrestrial-and-Wetland-Ecology.PDF [PDF, 622 KB]

   ...rural land in the Horowhenua lowlands, between the foothills of the Tararua Range and the sea. Most of the route lies in the southern Manawatū Plains Ecological District, with a small area within the Tararua Ecological District. 11. Prior to human settlement, almost all of the Ō2NL Project Area2 would have been densely forested, broken only by rivers and larger streams, and wetlands. The gentle terrain and fertile soils encouraged the conversion of the land to intensive agri...

6. [2024] NZEnvC 089 Shundi Queenstown Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 14 MB]

   SHUNDI v QLDC – FINAL DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 89 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN SHUNDI QUEENSTOWN LIMITED (ENV-2020-CHC-85) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner J T Baines Hearing: In Chambers on the papers Last case eve

7. [2024] NZEnvC 025 Shundi Queenstown Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA K IOTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 25 IN THE MA TIER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN SHUNDI QUEENSTOWN LIMITED AND Court: Hearing: Appearances: Last case event: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: (ENV-2020-CHC-85) Appellant QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner J T Baines 14 J

8. [2011] NZEmpC 48 Clear v Waikato DHB [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...was by then the area manager. The essence of the complaint was that the work environment was unchanged. Numerous matters were raised by Ms Clear all of which, bar one, Ms Osborn saw as historical. Ms Osborn had been advised by the Board‟s human relations personnel to address complaints as they arose rather than try to fix historical matters. She therefore dealt only with the one new matter, which related to the shredding of a document. [12] Ms Clear accepted that her relati...

9. [2010] NZEmpC 32 Maritime Union of NZ v Ports of Auckland [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...scheduled services but which are on short notice and require greater flexibility of labour provision. [63] In these circumstances just outlined, POAL has undertaken a major review of its container port operations including the important element of its human resources. This review is intended to be completed, and any new arrangements made as a result of it, by 30 June 2010. So while the port’s recovery from the economic downturn in 2009 has been generally better and quicker than...

10. [2010] NZEmpC 72 Horton v Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd [pdf, 81 KB]

    ...through to Peter Jepsen, PAE’s maintenance planner. [6] In a later investigation meeting, held on Wednesday 20 May 2009, there is a record of what Mr Jepsen told Brian Purser, Fonterra’s Maintenance Manager, and Emma Bennett, Fonterra’s Human Resources Adviser on the site, concerning the removal of the iron. Comparing the record of that interview with Mr Jepsen and Mr Horton’s account to Fonterra, it is common ground that Mr Horton told Mr Jepsen he wanted to take some r...