Search Results

1. [2017] NZEnvC 092 Golden Bay Grandstand v Heritage New Zealand [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...Interpretation In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,­ archaeological site means, subject to section 42(3),- (a) any place in New Zealand, including any building or structure (or part of a building or structure), that- (i) was associated with human activity that occurred before 1900 or is the site of the wreck of any vessel where the wreck occurred before 1900; and (ii) provides or may provide, through investigation by archaeological methods, evidence relating to the...

2. [2017] NZEmpC 70 Edminstin v Sanford Limited [pdf, 515 KB]

   ...Sanford. That is, if nothing else, antithetical to the significant energy and financial resources committed to the case by both parties and the potentially broader implications of the judgment I inferred from the evidence of Sanford’s (former) human resources manager. [6] Because what constitutes “marks” is in part at least in issue in this case, I will describe them for the purposes of this introduction generally and uncontroversially as follows. Marks are a navigat...

3. [2019] NZSSAA 05 (31 January 2019) [pdf, 529 KB]

   ...of loss of self-worth; it has caused stress to the community due to him acting out to the extent he has been imprisoned as a result. It has been extremely costly to the community as XXXX is a highly skilled man who cannot work. The cause of this human and economic cost is a physical illness, which is potentially able to be well managed. However, given 20 years of poor management, XXXX now needs a great deal of support. We are not able to say to what extent the predicament is the r...

4. Canterbury / Westland Standards Committee 3 v Johnson [2018] NZLCDT 5 [pdf, 464 KB]

   ...seriously. Initially, Mr Johnson denied that he had updated so infrequently, or had admitted so to the inspector, but he also conceded on this matter. [125] Mr Johnson accepted the errors, but minimised their seriousness, using terms such as “human error”, “honest mistake”, “not a widespread failure”, “accident” and “oversight”. We disagree. When we stand back and assess the overall picture, it falls far short of the standard required of a trust account partner,...

5. Chapman v Western Bay of Plenty District Council [pdf, 364 KB]

   ...possible to build the house adequately if the building process had been supervised in the way that Landmark claimed it would be. [20] Mr Clarke gave evidence as to how he managed Landmark, which included looking after the company’s finances, human resource issues, signing contracts, liaising with contractors, solicitors, accountants and oversaw credit issues. Mr Clarke was in day-to-day control of all the company’s activities. The evidence was that he kept a tight control...

6. [2020] NZIACDT 34 ZT v Li (20 July 2020) [pdf, 340 KB]

   IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2020] NZIACDT 34 Reference No: IACDT 031/18 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY THE REGISTRAR OF IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Registrar BETWEEN ZT Complainant AND MAIO (LIZ) LI Adviser HEARING: 20 July 2020 SUBJECT TO SUPPRESSION ORDER DE

7. [2019] NZEmpC 192 Johnson v Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force [pdf, 394 KB]

   ...manager was David Owen, Deputy Director of the Capability Branch. Mr Owen reported to Group Captain Woon. [17] For the purposes of the events I am about to describe, Group Captain Woon sought and received advice from Eszter Colebrooke, Senior Human Resource (HR) Advisor. mailto:taka3dive@gmail.com [18] On 12 January 2018, Group Captain Woon hand delivered a letter from herself to Mr Johnson, prepared with the assistance of Mrs Colebrooke. The letter began as follows:...

8. Bay of Plenty Regional Council Submissions - 29 November 2017 [pdf, 492 KB]

   ...follow that all adverse effects ought to be avoided in outstanding coastal landscapes and consequently no activities could be provided for: not even navigation aids otherwise consistent with Policy 9(b) NZCPS. Effectively, on that approach, any human activity might be regarded as necessarily causing adverse effects on the environment.39 43. The Court also emphasised (citing the Court of Appeal in Man of War Station) that much turns on what is sought to be protected.40 44. It is su...

9. [2023] NZEmpC 57 New Zealand Steel Ltd v Haddad [pdf, 444 KB]

   ...the Project Manager role for Pacific Steel was under offer. Mr Haddad noted his concern that he had not even had a chance to be interviewed for these roles. 29 His previous application was by way of an email as opposed to a letter. 30 A human resources practitioner in another team within NZ Steel. 31 Twelve days after Mr Haddad had expressed an interest in the roles. [107] The next day, on 24 October 2019, Ms Toeke and Mr Johnson met with Mr Haddad, confirming that...

10. [2022] NZEmpC 10 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [pdf, 376 KB]

    ...in place for and needs to be addressed urgently. [63] Mr Mitchell argued that this email was evidence that Ms Shaw was deprived of an opportunity to train and was a prompt to the DHB to take action. [64] The email was copied to the DHB’s Human Resources Manager, Nick Cockcroft. In response he instructed Ms Shaw not to copy emails to him when they should be sent to her manager. He informed her that if she had a complaint it should either be discussed with her manager, or she...