3994 items matching your search terms
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2021] NZLCRO 044 Ref: LCRO 196/2020 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [City] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN AB Applicant AND CD Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] Ms AB has a
1 Regulatory Impact Statement Review of the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004: Post Consultation Decisions Disclosure Statement 1. This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) was prepared by the Ministry of Justice as part of the policy development process for the Review of the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 (the 2004 Act). It provides a summary of the regulatory impact analysis of options for the allocation of rights and obligations of ownership in the public foreshore and
Barristers and Solicitors Wellington Solicitor Acting: David Allen / Thaddeus Ryan Email: david.allen@buddlefindlay.com / thaddeus.ryan@buddlefindlay.com Tel 64 4 044 620450 Fax 64 4 499 4141 PO Box 2694 DX SP20201 Wellington 6011 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ENV-2023-000005 Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of the direct referral of applications for resource co
...MDHB extending its services to include the Te Papaioea Birthing Centre.9 [13] The Authority recorded that as well as seeking approval for a “subsumption” of Te Papaioea, the Board paper outlined how this would occur. Under the heading “Human Resources”, it was noted that MDHB had undertaken workforce modelling to determine optimal staffing levels across both the Centre and its current services. A selection process would be held whereby staff at the Centre would be invite...
Family Safety Teams Pilot Evaluation: Stage One Baseline Study and Formative Evaluation A report prepared for the Ministry of Justice by Robyn Dixon & Deborah Widdowson Centre for Child and Family Policy Research Janet Fanslow & David Thomas Social and Community Health School of Population Health University of Auckland Trish Knaggs, Latika Vasil, Esther Banbury Ministry of Justice 31 August 2006 2
...events leading up to it. [20] On 26 April 2010, Detective Inspector Long contacted Mr Q to say that he would like to speak with him about two matters after the upcoming meeting; one of those related to correspondence Mr Q had sent to the Human Resources Manager, (Mr Shield) as well as to Superintendant Cliff. [21] The background to this issue was that Mr Q had requested a copy of the review prepared by Senior Sergeant Stewart (the Stewart Review). He had verbally requ...
...rock outcrops. This landscape retains a high natural character and has significant scenic values and some of it is identified in this District Plan as an outstanding natural landscape or outstanding natural feature. These values can be enhanced by human made elements which include orchards and vineyards; homesteads accompanied by stands of trees (often poplars); remnant stone cottages; small irrigation and stock water dams and water races; energy generation facilities; and shelter belts...
T H E M A N G A T Ū R E M E D I E S R E P O R T Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 3 W A I 8 1 4 T H E M A N G A T Ū R E M E D I E S R E
...Kamins, not to attend because of his resignation. On 8 December Mr Welch contacted the defendant to arrange a meeting to discuss the restructuring and, I find, the handover of the clients. The defendant had already given his laptop to Hally‘s human resources manager, Amanda Nottingham. The defendant was placed on garden leave through to the end date of his employment on 7 February 2011. [22] At the meeting on 9 December, Ms Nottingham and Mr Welch discussed the defendant...
102 Taitokerau MB 1 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20130008950 UNDER Section 26C, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An application by Te Ohu Kaimoana Trustee Limited for reference of Māori fisheries dispute between Te Rūnanga Nui o Te Aupōuri and Ngāti Kuri, Ngāi Takoto and Te Rarawa - referred under s 182(4), Māori Fisheries Act 2004 BETWEEN TE OHU KAIMOANA TRUSTEE LIMITED Applicant AND