Search Results

1. B R L v EQC & IAG New Zealand Ltd [2020] CEIT-2020-0051 [pdf, 934 KB]

   ...room also indicates that some factor has altered these levels between the date of construction and today. [76] It is reasonable to assume that the surfaces of the benchtop and of the window sill would have been constructed as close to level as humanly possible, bearing in mind that the window sill formed the top of a working surface, as did the bench. Moreover, there is a photograph of Mr Cowie in the process of installing the bench, looking along it to gauge its level. Beside him...

2. [2020] NZEnvC 213 Federated Farners of New Zealand Incorporated v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 3.6 MB]

   ...basis, as the policy does not rank or otherwise differentiate between them in tenns of the weight they are to be given. [362] The Lake Rotorua catchment is seriously over-allocated in terms of its capacity to cope with discharges of nutrients from human activities. This is not a situation where there is an existing surplus of nitrogen to allocate, so the first priority must be to reduce existing nitrogen (and phosphorus) discharges substantially if the desired water quality outcomes f...

3. Proposals against incitement of hatred and discrimination - discussion document - Urdu [pdf, 653 KB]

   ...https://consultations.justice.govt.nz کو اسپیس سڻیزن آپ ہے۔ کرتی فراہم طریقہ آسان ایک کا کرنے فراہم آپ بذریعہ ای میل یا ڈاک کی معرفت بھی جمع کرا سکتے ہیں ہیں۔ سکتے بھیج پر humanrights@justice.govt.nz میل ای بذریعہ عرضداشت اپنی آپ سکتے بھیج پر پتے کے Human Rights, Ministry of Justice, SX10088, Wellington عرضداشت تحریری آپ �...

4. [2021] NZEnvC 106 Rangitane o Tamaki Nui a Rua Incorporated v Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council [pdf, 861 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 106 IN THE MATTER OF appeals under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN RANGITĀNE O TAMAKI NUI Ā RUA INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-WLG-000034) TARARUA DISTRICT COUNCIL (ENV-2018-WLG-000035) Appellants AND MANAWATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent AND TARARUA DISTRICT COUNCIL Applicant Court: Environment Judge B P Dwyer Environme

5. Hauora-Chapt10W.pdf [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...te aroha. Prominent landmarks may prove to be unconquerable ; Prominent personalities, death overtakes. Born into the Pākehā World, expressive in, of, and with, the Māori World. Long have you fought this terrible illness, for which we as mere humans have as yet no answer. Farewell, you will become lost to us within the bosom of Earth Mother, amongst those precious to us there. We will not forget your willing sharing of your considerable expertise and depth of thought, which were es...

6. [2023] NZEmpC 56 Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand v Public Service Association, Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi [pdf, 471 KB]

   ...arise.18 [75] Opt-out options exist for employees in respect of a pay equity claim raised by a union.19 Thus, an employee can reserve her rights to raise her own pay equity claim in future, or raise a discrimination claim under the ER Act or the Human Rights Act 1993. [76] An employer in respect of a multi-employer pay equity claim may also opt-out of the process relating to such a claim;20 the claim may then be progressed separately.21 [77] Returning to the issue of whether...

7. [2022] NZEnvC 117 High Quality v Auckland Council [pdf, 885 KB]

   ...frontage with Great South Road looking directly at a number of business activities, the general impression of the area as walking along Willow Lane is eclectic. It could either be large lifestyle urban or rural, but it is certainly not devoid of human influence. There is a racetrack area and kennels immediately to the right, moving up Willow Lane with an old derelict house on the property to the left. Further up there is an early milk shed and then the replanting and landscaping...

8. [2021] NZACC 126 - Botha v ACC (4 August 2021) [pdf, 534 KB]

   TIN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 126 ACR 143/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN KEVIN BOTHA Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 15 June 2021 Heard at: Wellington/Whanganui-A-Tara Appearances: Ms B Peck for the appellant Mr S Bisley and Mr L Kibblewhite for the resp

9. BSA Text messages trial Final Report [pdf, 937 KB]

   ...messages, but we varied the time slots when they were sent (see Appendix 3 for the text-message schedule). We decided to not send equal numbers of text messages at each time slot, to make the process less resource intensive and to limit opportunities for human error. However, the batches of each type of text message sent were equal distributed over the course of the trial (see Table 1). Outcome measures We looked at the occurrence of three outcomes (behaviours) (see Table 2 for a d...

10. 2021-11-05 ORC - MOC - re chapter 6 [pdf, 3.4 MB]

    ...Objective 6.3.1. Agreement reached with all parties. The wording agreed on is shown in tracked changes below (red text shows text proposed as part of Plan Change 8). Objective 6.3.1 To avoid, remedy and mitigate the risk to the environment and human health from hazardous substances and hazardous wastes. Explanation Otago’s environment, including its communities, must be protected from the adverse effects of hazardous substances and hazardous wastes, associated with legitimate acti...