Search Results

1. Canterbury / Westland Standards Committee 3 v Johnson [2018] NZLCDT 5 [pdf, 464 KB]

   ...seriously. Initially, Mr Johnson denied that he had updated so infrequently, or had admitted so to the inspector, but he also conceded on this matter. [125] Mr Johnson accepted the errors, but minimised their seriousness, using terms such as “human error”, “honest mistake”, “not a widespread failure”, “accident” and “oversight”. We disagree. When we stand back and assess the overall picture, it falls far short of the standard required of a trust account partner,...

2. Chapman v Western Bay of Plenty District Council [pdf, 364 KB]

   ...possible to build the house adequately if the building process had been supervised in the way that Landmark claimed it would be. [20] Mr Clarke gave evidence as to how he managed Landmark, which included looking after the company’s finances, human resource issues, signing contracts, liaising with contractors, solicitors, accountants and oversaw credit issues. Mr Clarke was in day-to-day control of all the company’s activities. The evidence was that he kept a tight control...

3. [2020] NZIACDT 34 ZT v Li (20 July 2020) [pdf, 340 KB]

   IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2020] NZIACDT 34 Reference No: IACDT 031/18 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY THE REGISTRAR OF IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Registrar BETWEEN ZT Complainant AND MAIO (LIZ) LI Adviser HEARING: 20 July 2020 SUBJECT TO SUPPRESSION ORDER DE

4. [2019] NZEmpC 192 Johnson v Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force [pdf, 394 KB]

   ...manager was David Owen, Deputy Director of the Capability Branch. Mr Owen reported to Group Captain Woon. [17] For the purposes of the events I am about to describe, Group Captain Woon sought and received advice from Eszter Colebrooke, Senior Human Resource (HR) Advisor. mailto:taka3dive@gmail.com [18] On 12 January 2018, Group Captain Woon hand delivered a letter from herself to Mr Johnson, prepared with the assistance of Mrs Colebrooke. The letter began as follows:...

5. Bay of Plenty Regional Council Submissions - 29 November 2017 [pdf, 492 KB]

   ...follow that all adverse effects ought to be avoided in outstanding coastal landscapes and consequently no activities could be provided for: not even navigation aids otherwise consistent with Policy 9(b) NZCPS. Effectively, on that approach, any human activity might be regarded as necessarily causing adverse effects on the environment.39 43. The Court also emphasised (citing the Court of Appeal in Man of War Station) that much turns on what is sought to be protected.40 44. It is su...

6. [2023] NZEmpC 57 New Zealand Steel Ltd v Haddad [pdf, 444 KB]

   ...the Project Manager role for Pacific Steel was under offer. Mr Haddad noted his concern that he had not even had a chance to be interviewed for these roles. 29 His previous application was by way of an email as opposed to a letter. 30 A human resources practitioner in another team within NZ Steel. 31 Twelve days after Mr Haddad had expressed an interest in the roles. [107] The next day, on 24 October 2019, Ms Toeke and Mr Johnson met with Mr Haddad, confirming that...

7. [2022] NZEmpC 10 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [pdf, 376 KB]

   ...in place for and needs to be addressed urgently. [63] Mr Mitchell argued that this email was evidence that Ms Shaw was deprived of an opportunity to train and was a prompt to the DHB to take action. [64] The email was copied to the DHB’s Human Resources Manager, Nick Cockcroft. In response he instructed Ms Shaw not to copy emails to him when they should be sent to her manager. He informed her that if she had a complaint it should either be discussed with her manager, or she...

8. LCRO 196/2020 AB v CD (31 March 2021) [pdf, 309 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2021] NZLCRO 044 Ref: LCRO 196/2020 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [City] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN AB Applicant AND CD Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] Ms AB has a

9. Review of the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 Post Consultation Decisions [pdf, 993 KB]

   1 Regulatory Impact Statement Review of the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004: Post Consultation Decisions Disclosure Statement 1. This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) was prepared by the Ministry of Justice as part of the policy development process for the Review of the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 (the 2004 Act). It provides a summary of the regulatory impact analysis of options for the allocation of rights and obligations of ownership in the public foreshore and

10. 18.-Evidence-of-Dr-Alex-James-Freshwater-Ecology.PDF [PDF, 633 KB]

    Barristers and Solicitors Wellington Solicitor Acting: David Allen / Thaddeus Ryan Email: david.allen@buddlefindlay.com / thaddeus.ryan@buddlefindlay.com Tel 64 4 044 620450 Fax 64 4 499 4141 PO Box 2694 DX SP20201 Wellington 6011 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ENV-2023-000005 Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of the direct referral of applications for resource co