Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal - He Whiritaunoka (Whanganui) chapter 28 [pdf, 857 KB]

   1457 Chapter 28 Findings and Recommendations 28.1 Introduction here, we set out in digest form the tribunal’s findings and recommendations, with rele­ vant Crown concessions. We reproduce our findings here in summary form for ease of reference. Not all chapters had findings. For some, there are findings but no recommendations. This depends on the subject matter. We make no findings or recommendations about events before 1840. We make findings but no specific recommendations about nine

2. Allen + Clarke FV Courts Evaluation Final Report [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...as well as emotional support. FV Court practices appear to acknowledge and respect cultural differences and power imbalances, but are not particularly responsive to individuals’ cultural needs Within the FV Courts, there are clear attempts to humanise, respect, and acknowledge people of different cultures and to acknowledge the inherent power imbalance within the court process. This is particularly evident though the mana-enhancing engagement style of many judges, including the incor...

3. [2022] NZEnvC 163 11 Cheshire Street Body Corporate v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   11 Cheshire Street Body Corporate v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 163 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 120 the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN 11 CHESHIRE STREET BODY CORPORATE (ENV-2021-AKL-63) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey, sitting alone pursuant to s 279(1) of the Act Date of Order: 26 August 20

4. [2024] NZEnvC 044 Donaldson v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 5.7 MB]

   DONALDSON v QLDC – TOPIC 31 – FINAL DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 44 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN ROGER LINDSAY DONALDSON (ENV-2019-CHC-24) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner J T Baines Hearing: In

5. [2023] NZEnvC 242 New Zealand Transport Agency v Auckland Council [pdf, 21 MB]

   Civil v Auckland Council & Waka Kotahi IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 242 IN THE MATTER OF appeals under section 120 the Resource Management Act 1991 AND appeals under section 174 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN WAKA KOTAHI NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY (ENV-2021-AKL-000040) DIANNE CIVIL (ENV-2021-AKL-000042) (ENV-2021-AKL-000095) DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION

6. Issue 41: 1 October- 31 December 2024 [pdf, 949 KB]

   Recommendations Recap A summary of coronial recommendations and comments made between 1 October and 31 December 2024 Office of the Chief Coroner | 2024 (4) i Coroners’ recommendations and comments Coroners perform essential functions within our society. They inquire into a range of unexpected deaths to establish the identity of the person who has died and the cause and circumstances of their death. While inquiring into a d

7. [2016] NZEmpC 165 Lawson v NZ Transport Agency [pdf, 463 KB]

   ...agreement (IEA). In that role he reported directly to the Regional Manager, Mr Rick Barber. [11] Previously, he had worked for 18 years as a sworn police officer, 10 of them as a prosecutor. He was a police officer until 2004. He had also been a Human Resources Manager for Korucabs Sub Franchising Ltd in 2004 and 2005; and a driver for Korucabs Auckland Ltd from 2005 to 2007. [12] At the Agency, Mr Lawson managed a passenger team which covered taxis, buses, shuttles and pri...

8. [2018] NZEnvC 186 Housing New Zealand Corporation v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.6 MB]

   BEFORETHEEN~RONMENTCOURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND Decision No: [2018] NZEnvC '66 of an appeal under the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 HOUSING NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION (ENV -20 16-AKL -0000238) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge C J Thompson Date of Decision: Environment Commissioner K A Edmonds Deputy Environment Commissioner R

9. ENV-2016-CHC-000047 Blueskin Energy Limited v Dunedin City Council - Application - Appendix B3 [pdf, 484 KB]

   Blueskin People Power Community perspectives on the BRCT energy project Seth Gorrie Report conducted as part of a University of Otago Summer Research Scholarship April 2011 2 Contents 1. Background Page 5 2. Sense of Community Page 9 2.1 Community demographic 2.2 Community division 2.3 Symbols 2.4 Public awareness of the energy project 2.5 Profile of the energy project 2.6 Legacies of past events and projects

10. [2020] NZEnvC 013 Edens v Thames Coromandel District Council [pdf, 23 MB]

    ...regard for either considerations of amenity and character or the views of the expert witnesses on ecology. Assessment criteria, performance standards and management plans are not sufficient to address the pressures that additional dwellings and human activity generally may put on the environment. Realistically, while said not to be a target, the 10-lot cap will be seen by developers as goal where the objective is to maximise development yield and financial return, notwithstanding th...