Search Results

1. Nepe v Woodville Community Committee Incorporated (Strike-Out) [2023] NZHRRT 40 [pdf, 147 KB]

   Reference No. HRRT 018/2022 HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN ANNETTE NEPE PLAINTIFF AND WOODVILLE COMMUNITY COMMITTEE INCORPORATED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS WOODVILLE DISTRICTS VISION INCORPORATED) DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Ms SJ Eyre, Chairperson Ms BL Klippel, Member Ms SP Stewart, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms A Nepe, currently unrepresented Woodville Community Committee Incorporated, currently unrepresented DATE OF HEARING: On the papers...

2. EI v EE Ltd [2024] NZDT 529 (3 July 2024) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...to provide her with food as ordered and for the distress and harm she has, and is, suffering from this. 3. EE Ltd was represented by its general manager, BE. EE Ltd maintains it operates quality and compliant food safety controls but accepts human error did result in the wrong food being supplied to EI and her husband. Having waived a range of account charges for EI however, EE Ltd believes it has met its legal responsibilities for compensation. 4. The issues to be resolved are:...

3. Briefing for incoming Minister 2017 - Votes Justice and Courts [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...powers conferred on the Minister of Justice. These include: a) Responsibility for the Government’s ownership interest in the Ministry of Justice, as Responsible Minister for the overall Ministry, and Vote Justice Crown entities, comprising the Human Rights Commission, Electoral Commission, Office of the Privacy Commissioner, Law Commission, Real Estate Agents Authority, Public Trust and Independent Police Conduct Authority (see Appendix D for further information on Crown entitie...

4. Watson v Capital and Coast District Health Board [2015] NZHRRT 27 [pdf, 199 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2015] NZHRRT 27 Reference No. HRRT 028/2013 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN ANGELA EMMA WATSON PLAINTIFF AND CAPITAL AND COAST DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Mr RK Musuku, Member Hon KL Shirley, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr AJ McKenzie for plaintiff Ms AC Whittaker for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 16 and 17 February 2015 DAT...

5. CBA v LKJ Ltd [2014] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE PLAINTIFF, DEFENDANT AND EMPLOYEES OF THE DEFENDANT (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE CHAIRPERSON OR OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 13 Reference No. HRRT 034/2011 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN CBA PLAINTIFF AND LKJ LIMITED DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines...

6. [2020] NZEnvC 018 Taranaki Energy Watch Incorporated v South Taranaki District Council [pdf, 5.4 MB]

   ...- DECISION 2020 2 [1] This is the second Interim Decision concerning an appeal by Taranaki Energy Watch in relation to the proposed South Taranaki District Plan. [2] The appeal raises two broad topics of concern: (a) Topic A - the risk of human fatality attendant upon a fire or explosion; and (b) Topic B - the risk of adverse health effects from the emission of contaminants to air. [3] In this decision, we consider further evidence produced on the topic of risk and the wordi...

7. Gay and Lesbian Clergy Anti-Discrimination Society Inc v Bishop of Auckland (Non-Party Access by TVNZ to Tribunal File) [2013] NZHRRT 17 [pdf, 37 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 17 Reference No. HRRT 021/2012 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATON BY TVNZ FOR ACCESS TO THE TRIBUNAL FILE BETWEEN THE GAY AND LESBIAN CLERGY ANTI- DISCRIMINATION SOCIETY INC PLAINTIFF AND THE BISHOP OF AUCKLAND DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND TRIBUNAL: Rodger Haines QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Mr D Ryken and Mr G Wong for Plaintiff Mr B Gray QC and Pro...

8. BORA Misuse of Drugs (Medicinal Cannabis and Other Matters) Amendment Bill [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...practitioner. Consistency of the Bill with the Bill of Rights Act Section 19(1) – Freedom from discrimination 4. Section 19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right to be free from discrimination on the prohibited grounds set out in the Human Rights Act 1993 (‘the Human Rights Act’). 5. The key questions determining whether legislation limits the freedom from discrimination are: 1 a. does the legislation draw a distinction on one of the prohibited grounds of discrim...

9. BORA Youth Employment Training and Education Bill [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...its purpose. Consistency of the Bill with the Bill of Rights Act Section 19(1) – Freedom from discrimination 4. Section 19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right to be free from discrimination on the prohibited grounds set out in the Human Rights Act 1993 (‘the Human Rights Act’). 5. The key questions determining whether legislation limits the freedom from discrimination are: 1 a. does the legislation draw a distinction on one of the prohibited grounds of discrimi...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 33 Carrigan v The Attorney-General [pdf, 101 KB]

    ...Zealand Council of Trade Unions (NZCTU) for leave to appear and be heard. [2] During the course of a telephone directions conference with the parties, it was agreed that an opportunity would be given to the NZCTU, Business New Zealand and the Human Rights Commission to apply to intervene and to be heard in the proceedings, given the nature of the issues involved. [3] Notice was accordingly given to those three organisations. Business New Zealand has advised the Court that it d...