4109 items matching your search terms
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 33 Reference No. HRRT 026/2012 UNDER SECTION 50 OF THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND RUTH NELSON DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms K Anderson, Member Ms WV Gilchrist, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr A Martin, Director of Proceedings, Plaintiff and Ms H Cook Mr AC Beck for defendant...
1 28 March 2006 Attorney-General LEGAL ADVICE CONSISTENCY WITH THE NEW ZEALAND BILL OF RIGHTS ACT 1990: HUMAN TISSUE (ORGAN DONATION) AMENDMENT BILL 1. We have considered the Human Tissue (Organ Donation) Amendment Bill (the "Bill") for consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 ("Bill of Rights Act"). The Bill, a Member’s Bill in the name of Dr Jackie Blue MP, was introduced to the House of Representatives on 22 March 20...
Reference No. HRRT 030/2021 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN TAIMING ZHANG PLAINTIFF AND THE FIRST ORG LIMITED (TRADING AS RED HILL RESTAURANT) DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Ms MG Coleman, Deputy Chairperson Ms ST Scott QSM, Member Ms EF Tait, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr T Zhang in person Mr J Todd for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 12 March 2024 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT TH...
...legitimacy and sovereignty. (g) Parliamentary sovereignty and systems. (h) Ngā ture Pākehā. Theme three (i) Electoral rights and systems. Theme four (j) Local government and te Tiriti o Waitangi / the Treaty of Waitangi. Theme five (k) Human rights and te Tiriti o Waitangi / the Treaty of Waitangi. Theme six (l) Citizenship rights. Wai 3300, #6.2.18 teofilh New Stamp What is a constitution? According to The Report of Matike Mai Aotearoa – The Independent Working Gro...
Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2004 Process Map for Section 65 Applications to the Family Court under the HART Act Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2004 Process Map for Section 65 Applications to the Family Court under the HART Act C o u rt s ta ff C o u rt s ta ff A p p li ca n t A p p li ca n t Ju d g e Ju d g e L a w y e r to A ss is t L a w y e r to A ss is t D IA /F e rt il it y C li n ic D IA /F e rt il it y C li n i...
...of non-striking teacher, whether or not they are on the list. That would facilitate early correction of any error. http://ndhadeliver.natlib.govt.nz/ArcAggregator/arcView/resource/IE26146201/http:/www.justice.govt.nz/policy/constitutional-law-and-human-rights/human-rights/bill-of-rights/state-sector-amendment-bill-no.3-2003#Footnotes 11. In accordance with your instructions, we attach a copy of this opinion for referral to the Minister of Justice. A copy is also attached for referral to t...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 19 Reference No. HRRT 011/2013 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN KEVIN ALLAN WATERS PLAINTIFF AND ALPINE ENERGY LIMITED DEFENDANT AT TIMARU BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms DL Hart, Member Hon KL Shirley, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr KA Waters in person Ms AL Keir for defendant DATE OF DECISION: 6 May 2014 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ORDERING STAY OF DE...
...Action Plan”. Consistency of the Bill with the Bill of Rights Act Section 19(1) – Freedom from discrimination 6. Section 19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right to be free from discrimination on the prohibited grounds set out in the Human Rights Act 1993 (‘the Human Rights Act’). 7. The key questions determining whether legislation limits the freedom from discrimination are:1 a. does the legislation draw a distinction on one of the prohibited grounds of di...
...imposed by the Bill are justified under s 5 of the Bill of Rights Act. Section 19(1) – Freedom from discrimination 12. Section 19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right to be free from discrimination on the prohibited grounds set out in the Human Rights Act 1993 (‘the Human Rights Act’). 13. The key questions determining whether legislation limits the freedom from discrimination are: 2 1 Hansen v R [2007] NZSC 7 [123]....
...Policy, and Drug Alcohol and Substance Procedure. [5] In her judgment granting leave to bring a challenge out of time, Chief Judge Inglis noted that the dispute raises important legal questions, including as to the intersection of employment and human rights law.3 She observed that whilst workplace drug testing had previously been considered by the Court, that was in 2004.4 [6] The matter has been set down for hearing in mid-November 2021. The Chief Judge has constituted a full C...