3994 items matching your search terms
Reference No. HRRT 067/2021 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN ITWINDER SINGH PLAINTIFF AND STEPHEN MCKEE DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Ms J Foster, Deputy Chairperson Ms LJ Gorringe JP, Member Ms BL Klippel, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr I Singh in person Mr PF Wicks KC for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 1 August 2023 DATE OF DECISION: 2 February 2024 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 [1] Mr Singh worked for approximately 10 years as a stable...
...ensure that refuelling of machinery or equipment shall not take place in an area where spills may enter surface water. 31. The exercise of any activities authorised by these consents shall not cause flooding on any downstream properties. 32. If any human remains, artefacts or evidence of human occupation are uncovered during any excavation authorised by these resource consents, the consent holder shall: (a) Immediately cease further excavation and cordon off the area to prevent further...
Reference No. HRRT 021/2018 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN MARIKA NGATAUIRA BEAUCHAMP PLAINTIFF AND B & T CO (2011) LIMITED TRADING AS ADZUKI BEAN CAFÉ AND RESTAURANT FIRST DEFENDANT AND BING DU SECOND DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms J Foster, Deputy Chairperson Ms LJ Alaeinia JP, Member Mr RK Musuku, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms E Tait for plaintiff Mr J Todd for defendants DATE OF HE...
...the Chief Executive, Department of Corrections (“Corrections”). He made a third request for information in October 2019 to a lawyer acting for Corrections. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Gorgus v Corrections [2023] NZHRRT 22] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2023] NZHRRT 22 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] The July 2019 requests were not actioned nor were they formally responded to until after Mr Gorgus made a complaint to the Privacy Commissioner in November 2...
...Bureau, New Zealand Defence Force and New Zealand Police to facilitate their functions and co-operating with other agencies to respond to an imminent threat to life or safety. In exercising its functions, the NZSIS acts in accordance with the law and human rights obligations, independently and impartially, and in a manner that facilitates democratic oversight. Warrants The NZSIS is able to seek a range of authorisations from urgent to very urgent to Type 1 and Type 2 intelligence war...
...These changes will enhance complainants’ confidence that their complaints can be resolved quickly and efficiently. The proposal will enable the Commissioner to make decisions on complaints relating to access to information, rather than the Human Rights Review Tribunal. The Commissioner’s decisions can be appealed to the Tribunal. This implements a recommendation of the Law Commission. 5 Other proposals The Government has also agreed to a number of other proposals,...
...Emblems and Names Protection Act 1981 • Habeas Corpus Act 2001 • Harassment Act 1997 • Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015 • Hawke’s Bay Regional Planning Committee Act 2015 • Hotel Association of New Zealand Act 1969 • Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2004 • Human Rights Act 1993 • Imperial Laws Application Act 1988 • Imprisonment for Debt Limitation Act 1908 • Independent Police Conduct Authority Act 1988 • Inferior Courts Procedure...
...Emblems and Names Protection Act 1981 • Habeas Corpus Act 2001 • Harassment Act 1997 • Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015 • Hawke’s Bay Regional Planning Committee Act 2015 • Hotel Association of New Zealand Act 1969 • Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2004 • Human Rights Act 1993 • Imperial Laws Application Act 1988 • Imprisonment for Debt Limitation Act 1908 • Independent Police Conduct Authority Act 1988 • Inferior Courts Procedure...
...the Council submits, reflects the fact that Ms George sat on the advice she received and did nothing about it. She refutes any such inference. Ms George is sure that she told Mr Monk about the draft report and that he asked her to send it to Human Resources, which she believes she would have done. She gave evidence that such an approach would be consistent with her usual practice of forwarding documents of interest, either via email or by way of hard copy distribution. She would...
...three classes of causes (of effects) in the RMA: 1. activities (or its synonym38 “uses”); 2. natural hazards; and 3. climate change. The first class is familiar to lawyers. It is simply a subset of the array of activities undertaken by humans. [22] As for the other two classes, s 2 RMA states: natural hazard means any atmospheric or earth or water related occurrence (including earthquake, tsunami, erosion, volcanic and geothermal activity, landslip, subsidence, sedimenta...