UB v OZ LCRO 11 / 2012 (11 October 2012) [pdf, 111 KB]
...completed before the retainer was terminated was not, in my view, due to any culpable failure on the part of the Practitioner. He is entitled to be paid for the work that was done. [45] The Practitioner also reminded me that there were five different jobs and five files that he had opened, only two of which concerned the termination of franchises. As instructed, the Practitioner reviewed the Applicant’s franchise agreement, and also reviewed (and made suggestions) in respect of...