LCRO 13/2021 ZW v HN (25 November 2021) [pdf, 250 KB]
...depiction of Mr HN as a person experienced in litigation matters (which it appears he was), and his advancing of argument that Mr HN was not a vulnerable client, appeared to suggest that Mr ZW had expectation that if he himself did not get on with the job, Mr HN would. [68] None of these arguments assisted Mr ZW. To the contrary, they diminished his position. They reflected a casual indifference on the part of Mr ZW to his fundamental obligation to advance and protect the interes...