Search Results

1. Taueki - Horowhenua 11 Part Reservation Trust [2018] Māori Appellate Court MB 512 (2018 APPEAL 512) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...registrar to oversee the election of trustees is another indication that the situation was fraught. After a trustee election at an AGM on 9 April 2016, the injunction application came back to court on 19 May 2016 before Judge Doogan. It was his job to appoint the new trustees. Fourteen persons were nominated for 11 positions. [23] In court, the situation remained contentious, because Phillip Taueki, Charles Rudd and Vivienne Taueki objected to the appointment of some proposed tru...

2. Holden v Hanns [pdf, 48 KB]

   ...about two years before the application on the houses in dispute. There are no other disputes, indicating that they were generally competent. 34. Equus argue that a system of approved training is not a warranty for all purposes. A failure on one job does not demonstrate a deficient training and approval system. There is nothing in the training or approval process that led, in some foreseeable way, to the alleged defects of the property. It is too remote to be liable. 35. Equus sa...

3. Evidence Brief: Reintegration services [pdf, 418 KB]

   ...general public. The Department of Corrections partners with employers to create relationships between offenders and prospective employers. Employers engaged in the Release to Work programme are encouraged to offer permanent and sustainable jobs to their Release to Work workers following release. In 2014/15, 50% of prisoners who took part in Release to Work gained permanent employment with the same employer at the end of their sentence.vii The Department of Corrections als...

4. Shihaku v Mizoguchi [2019] NZIACDT 24 (24 April 2019) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...from Mr Mizoguchi (1 April 2019). He advises that he has learned from the complaints made against him and has improved his knowledge and skills. He wants to continue to work as an immigration adviser and believes that he is now better at his job and in dealing with his clients. 3 Joint Statement, 4 April 2019, at [4]. 6 [36] Mr Mizoguchi confirms that he is currently enrolled in Toi-Ohomai’s Refresher Course and is seeking to r...

5. [2020] NZIACDT 29 - Immigration New Zealand (Carley) v Penty (6 July 2020) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...September and October 2016. The complaint against Ms Penty concerned 11 Filipino clients for whom she had acted between about March 2017 and August 2018. [9] The standard arrangement saw IPS/BNAC source both the worker in the Philippines and the job in New Zealand. [10] The primary, and for most clients, only contact Ms Penty had with the client was one Skype interview. In respect of a small number of clients, Ms Penty attempted unsuccessfully to engage them by email. [11]...

6. Online Final PO Information at Service Pack Respondent [pdf, 461 KB]

   ...take any weapons. They may also charge you for not following this Order. In a few exceptions, the Order may state that you are allowed to have or use a weapon or allow you to have a firearms licence (for example if it is needed as part of your job). In those cases, the Protection Order will describe how you can access and use this weapon. You can apply to remove or change the order This is a Final Protection Order. This means these rules are in place forever or until a Judge...

7. [2020] NZSSAA 9 (5 May 2020) [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...must facilitate the prosecution of the appeal. For example, s 12K requires the appellant to lodge a written notice of appeal with the Authority and to send or leave with the Chief Executive a copy of that notice of appeal. At that point it is the job of the Chief Executive to provide any necessary background information to the Authority to assist its assessment of the appeal including “a report setting out the considerations to which regard was had in making the decision or determinati...

8. [2019] NZEmpC 198 Jobbitt v 4 Seasons Indoor Outdoor Living (2014) Ltd [pdf, 379 KB]

   STEVEN JOBBITT v 4 SEASONS INDOOR OUTDOOR LIVING (2014) LIMITED [2019] NZEmpC 198 [20 December 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 198 EMPC 147/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to strike out proceedings BETWEEN STEVEN JOBBITT Plaintiff AND 4 S

9. Cooper v Hamilton Pharmacy 2011 Ltd (Pre-Trial Admissibility Ruling) [2018] NZHRRT 53 [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   ...intended evidence is that in July 2014, while working in a pharmacy in Hamilton, she was informed by a colleague that Andrea Coombes (a director of Hamilton Pharmacy) had told that colleague that Mr Cooper should not be employed were he to seek a job with the colleague. Ms Barrett was under the impression Ms Coombes had telephoned the colleague specifically to discuss Mr Cooper and the recommendation that he (Mr Cooper) not be employed or engaged for work. Ms Barrett goes on to state that...

10. [2018] NZEmpC 117 GEA Process Engineering Ltd v Schicker [pdf, 237 KB]

    ...alleged that while Mr Schicker was still its employee, he had revealed to Dynaflow plans which GEA had to develop a valve servicing business. It was also alleged that Mr Schicker took some of GEA’s confidential information for use in his new job with Dynaflow. GEA commenced proceedings in the Authority for orders requiring Mr Schicker to comply with his confidentiality obligations under his former employment with GEA and not to assist Dynaflow’s own valve servicing business. A...