LCRO 137/2018 A1 v B2 (26 November 2018) [pdf, 158 KB]
...instructions. It appears from the position Mr JB took in the Family Court litigation that, as K’s father, he wanted to be more involved in her upbringing. Everything Ms B2 did is consistent with furthering that overarching objective. That was her job. It must be assumed those were her instructions. [39] Ms A1’s complaint is inextricably bound up with her view that she knows best where K’s interests lay. However, if parents cannot agree what is best for the welfare of their...