Search Results

1. [2015] NZEmpC 36 Yan v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...this preliminary decision were traversed in the correspondence, including the unsatisfactory outcome of the third PIP period and Mr Ridling’s assessment of Mr Yan’s performance overall. This conclusion was expressed by way of reference to the job expectations for Mr Yan’s position. Mr Ridling met with Mr Yan briefly on 8 December and handed him the letter. [36] Mr Yan gave evidence that he was caught off guard by the turn of events on 8 December as he had been expecting...

2. [2016] NZEmpC 54 H v A Ltd [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...unwelcome or offensive or both. She also made it tolerably clear in her complaint that the behaviour was both repeated and of such a significant nature that it had a detrimental effect, if not on the totality of her employment, at least on her job performance or job satisfaction. She 8 This Act has since been repealed and was replaced on 1 April 2016 by the Health & Safety at Work Act (2015). 9 See Healthland South Ltd v Flana...

3. Sell v Harris [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...what did happen. He was clear and accurate in communicating general building processes and the processes he was likely to follow. He found it more difficult recalling or being specific about things that actually happened in relation to this job. It is however understandable that he would have difficulty after almost 13 years recalling one job from another. [84] There is also no reliable evidence that Mrs Sell undertook any on-site supervision. When Mr Harris was asked to...

4. Cao v Tony Tay and Associates Ltd (in liq) [2010] NZWHT Auckland 26 [pdf, 270 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-100-000119 [2010] NZWHT AUCKLAND 26 BETWEEN HAI CAO and YANMING TAO Claimants AND TONY TAY AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED (In Liquidation) First Respondent AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND BRIAN WILLIAM NEWTH Third Respondent AND ALLAN CHRISTINI (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND TONY MENG HIANG TAY Fifth Respondent AND SELINA SIAW NYUNAK TAY Sixth Respondent AND JOHN WATTS TRAD

5. [2016] NZEmpC 112 Radius Residential Care Ltd v The NZ Nurses Organisation Inc [pdf, 431 KB]

   ...coverage of staff in those facilities included registered and enrolled nurses, healthcare assistants, cleaners, kitchen and laundry assistants, cooks, activities co-ordinators and diversional therapists. Employees’ particular duties were set out in job descriptions and the collective agreement expressed an expectation that “… employees shall carry out their duties well, faithfully and diligently providing the employer the full benefit of the employee’s experience and knowledg...

6. [2019] NZEnvC 084 Kilmarnock Farm Limited v Canterbury Regional Council [pdf, 8.7 MB]

   ...called Mr Bennett to discuss his FEP further. The primary purpose of the call was that Mr Deans asked him to review the FEP for his property. This was a brief conversation: Mr Bennett informed Mr Deans that he would not be able to undertake this job until mid-October when he returned from leave. However, during the conversation, Mr Deans brought up the need to give effect to his two water permits by the end of September 2017. Mr Bennett stated in his affidavit40 : I recall saying to...

7. LCRO 275/2015 and 9/2016 YM v SC and JW (18 December 2018) [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...reflected a desire on the part of the equity partners to respond to complaints which directly engaged and involved policies followed, and decisions made, by the equity partners. [56] Mr BY submitted that: 9 (a) it is not a solicitor’s job to be right, but to formulate arguments and propositions that may assist the client, with due regard to risk; (b) the clients realised it would be an expensive exercise to review the documents; (c) the clients also acknowledged, or did...

8. 2021-03-14 Joanna Gilroy - Evidence (13 March 2021) [pdf, 20 MB]

   ...consent terms sought by applicants since PC7 was notified:2 2 Transcript, p 239, line 17-21. 9 Term sought Number of applications 1 year 4 6 years 6 10 years 3 15 years 11 16-20 years 10 21-25 20 35 65 34 Part of my job is assigning the applications and when deciding who to assign them to I check what term has been applied for and I look at the assessment of PC7. In some applications limited weight and focus has been placed on PC7. This is addressed in t...

9. Bacic v Tulip Holdings Limited (in liq) [pdf, 110 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-100-000046 BETWEEN BORIS and GIORDANA BACIC Claimants AND TULIP HOLDINGS LIMITED (previously named Buildcorp Holdings Ltd) (In liquidation & removed) First Respondent AND NORTH SHORE CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND JAMES MICHAEL FAIRGRAY Third Respondent AND RICHARD ARTHUR ZGIERSKI- BOREYKO Fourth Respondent AND MALCOM BROWN MURRAY DAY ARCHITECTS (Removed 5 August 2008) Fifth Respondent AND SEAN LAK

10. [2017] NZEmpC 39 ALA v ITE [pdf, 317 KB]

    ALA v ITE NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 39 [12 April 2017] THERE IS AN ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF THE NAMES OF THE PARTIES AND ANY INFORMATION LEADING TO THE PARTIES’ IDENTITY IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 39 EMPC 282/2016 IN THE MATTER OF an application for orders under s 140(6) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN ALA Plaintiff AND ITE Defendant Hearing: 27, 28 February 2017 (heard at Taurang