LCRO 180/2018 & 186/2018 KM on behalf of XYZ Trust v DF (5 May 2020) [pdf, 159 KB]
...determination at [68]. 19 Mr DF, application for review, attached reasons at [3]. 20 At [3]. 9 time to file an amended SOC should examination of the documents reveal the need for it”.21 3. Billing / refund [51] Mr KM argues “that the job agreed to be done was never attempted, and that which was charged for, was never authorised”.22 [52] He says that anything Mr DF had done was a ‘waste of time’ (because of the inadequate discovery) and should not therefore be charg...