DF v QT [2024] NZDT 474 (11 June 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]
...to replace the boundary fence between [address 1] and [address 2]. 4. Both parties submitted this information to their insurers. The claims were accepted, and they received payment of $3,785.00 each. 5. Mr U then refused to proceed with the job. In DF’s view, he did so because he realised that he had under-quoted the job. DF suspects this because when she sought alternative quotes, they were substantially more expensive. 6. [Construction company] quoted $12,539.08 for the j...