Search Results

1. [2009] NZEmpC AC 6A/09 Bay Milk Distributors Ltd v Jopson [pdf, 41 KB]

   ...the company’s delivery operations. The assessment was to determine which drivers and other staff would be best suited to operate these revised and reduced schedules. [7] As a result of that exercise Mr Jopson and another employee lost their jobs for redundancy. Both challenged their dismissals in the Authority although, as already noted, the other employee’s case is not now before the Court. The Authority’s determination [8] It correctly identified the statutory test in s1...

2. [2018] NZEmpC 16 Nathan v Broadspectrum (New Zealand) Ltd [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...7 Nathan v Broadspectrum (New Zealand) Ltd [2017] NZEmpC 90 at [19]. 8 At [18]. 9 At [26]. 10 At [47]. 11 At [79]. 12 Nathan v Broadspectrum (New Zealand) Ltd [2017] NZEmpC 116. 13 At [15]. to his former job unless it was satisfied he was safe.14 Instead he was invited to undertake scoping work,15 which the company considered complied with the Court’s decisions.16 Scoping work is associated with decommissioning the lines network. This applic

3. [2020] NZIACDT 16 - NL v Joseph - Sanctions (12 March 2020) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...REPRESENTATION: Registrar: S Pragji, counsel Complainant: A McClymont, counsel Adviser: Self-represented 2 INTRODUCTION [1] The complainant, Ms NL, instructed Mr Ashar Joseph, the adviser, to seek a work visa based on a job offer from a business in which Mr Joseph had an interest. He told a staff member to sign the relevant employment documents in the name of the business owner. They were provided to Immigration New Zealand. The owner initially denied know...

4. [2022] NZACC 16 – Forde v ACC (26 January 2022) [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...ACC45 injury claim form was completed with a diagnosis of post-concussion syndrome and the suggested treatment was “OT for specialist opinion re post-concussion syndrome and assessment”. [5] On 1 July 2014, the appellant resigned from his job as a commercial drainlayer, a job involving driving heavy machinery and trucks. He informed ACC of his resignation on 3 July 2014. [6] On 7 July 2014, a concussion service report was completed noting that the appellant had resigned...

5. OF v D Ltd [2019] NZDT 1405 (9 August 2019) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...extra. It simply formed part of the work for which the estimate was given. 16. The second category of additional costs arose from extra labour in having to re-do filler, etching and priming from the car remaining in storage for so long whilst the job was being done. Mr G assessed the extra labour required for this as being in the order of $3,000.00. I am satisfied that it was not contemplated at the time of the original estimate that the work would take place over such a long perio...

6. [2010] NZEmpC 42 Wang v Hamilton Multicultural Services Trust [pdf, 20 KB]

   ...original notice requiring disclosure, the following orders were made: 1.0 Employment agreements 1.1 The Migrant Internship Coordinator employment agreement will be listed. 1.2 The employment agreement of the Finance Manager will be listed. 2.0 Job descriptions [5] Job descriptions for the following persons will be listed: 2.2 Financial Administrator 2.4 Migrant Internship 2.5 Centre Cordinator 2.6 Finance Assistant 2.8 Interpreting Service Coordinator 2...

7. AEZ and AFA v ZUV t-a SR [2013] NZDT 225 (16 July 2013) [pdf, 59 KB]

   ...of the dates and hours he worked on the staircase. ZUV said that he threw his notebook page containing these details away when he made up the account, as is his usual practice. As a result, ZUV is unable to prove the hours he has spent on this job and I cannot have confidence that the hours he has charged represent the hours actually spent on the job. [12] I have decided to rely on the three alternative prices obtained by AEZ and AFA as representing a range of reasonable prices...

8. DU & HU c/- V Trust v UT Ltd [2021] NZDT 1591 (28 July 2021) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...at the Property. On 31 May 2021, UT invoiced DU and HU for the balance of the quotation, which was $1,528.35 (“the Outstanding Balance”). DU and HU have not paid the Outstanding Balance because they are not satisfied with various aspects of the job. 3. DU and HU say that, after the new heat pump was installed, they were disappointed to find that there was damage to the wall below the new heat pump which UT had not told them would be a possibility. The damage consists of a small hol...

9. CU v QD Ltd [2022] NZDT 48 (19 May 2022) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...any printing requiring special finishing such as laminating, creasing, folding will take one extra day to complete, and that “large orders will require an extended turn around time”. 8. She says next day delivery does not apply to a booklet job the size of CU’s which was a 3-4 day job and is considered a large order. NN said customers wanting a quick turnaround of an order of the nature and size of CU’s would raise that at the time of the order so that delivery time and cost...

10. SM v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 155 (10 May 2023) [pdf, 229 KB]

    ...says a drain on the deck had become blocked and water pooled, finding ingress behind the waterproof layer in one corner of the deck, which had caused damage to the ceiling and walls of a downstairs bedroom at her property. 2. D Ltd attended the job, NP for D Ltd saying that they ripped the vinyl floor surface out and found the plywood underneath to be ok, but that they could not see where the leak was coming from. They applied their surface coating — NP says they are not waterproofi...