[2023] NZEmpC 57 New Zealand Steel Ltd v Haddad [pdf, 444 KB]
...humiliating. [5] NZ Steel did not ultimately appoint Mr Haddad to any of the roles because, it says, in the absence of an interview, it was not able to determine his suitability for any of them and was entitled to appoint the best person for the job(s). It terminated Mr Haddad’s employment for redundancy. [6] Mr Haddad brought a grievance for unjustified dismissal in the Employment Relations Authority. He was successful and awarded reinstatement, three months’ lost earnings...