Search Results

1. MT v IN [2024] NZDT 507 (25 June 2024) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...and it is decaying in places. 10. For all the reasons given above, I consider it most appropriate for the cost of a new fence to be shared between the neighbours (as per the provisions of the Fencing Act), but for the retaining aspects of the job to be paid for by MT, along with any drainage needed on her side as she wishes, because the natural ground contours were altered on MT’s side originally, so she is required to continue to support the land at the boundary. CI0301_CIV_D...

2. TC v L Ltd & WC [2024] NZDT 898 (6 December 2024) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...cracked. She called her insurance company who carried out an investigation. They found that the cracking was due to the film treatment that was applied to the glass and declined her application for cover. TC called L Ltd but was told it was ‘WC’s job’. Over the following months TC attempted to contact WC to find a remedy for her cracked panes. She said that he made lots of promises to provide a remedy, but none eventuated. During this time, more cracks formed, and the condition...

3. [2025] NZIACDT 41 – KU v Wang (1 August 2025) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Self-represented Complainant: No appearance Adviser: S Laurent, counsel 2 INTRODUCTION [1] The complainant engaged a consulting company which in turn engaged the adviser, to find a job for him and then seek his visa. The visa application was successful and the complainant came to New Zealand, but shortly afterwards returned to China for reasons unknown to the Tribunal. [2] A complaint to the Immigration Advisers Authori

4. [2010] NZEmpC 146 Robertson v Envirowaste Services Ltd [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...October, Mr Robertson made a delivery of a 30m2 Huka Bin to a timber merchant and building supplies firm, T. Braithwaite Timbers Ltd (Braithwaites), at Taumarunui. He had done this delivery at least six times before. His evidence was that the job was not part of his normal work, which included refuse collection and cartage, because the bins belonged to Supa Shavings, which was owned by the previous owner of Supa Bins. That person did not have a truck available that day and Mr Rob...

5. Ms E 21 July 2015 NZSHD 7 [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...despite being closely related by blood to these same persons. [59] She notes that this officer’s dream of joining the NZ Police wasn’t cut short because of his direct blood connection with a criminal family. She says she is sure he does a fine job and that everyone should be judged by their own successes and failures. Her daughter however has an even stronger case that the police officer not to be judged and stopped from furthering her chosen career, there being no blood relationship...

6. ZA v YB LCRO 23/2014 (31 August 2016) [pdf, 65 KB]

   ...of those instructions has not been aired in the complaint and review process, nor should they be, given Ms [RI]’s instructions were no longer joint. [48] Having been instructed, it was incumbent on Mr [ZA] to get the files and get on with the job Ms [RI] had instructed him to do. He was entitled to rely on Ms [RI]’s instruction that briefs were to be filed by 14 December 2012. [49] Matters were not so straight forward for Mr [YB]. His reactions were understandable in circumstance...

7. INZ (Gilray) v Croxson [2019] NZIACDT 72 (18 October 2019) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...application of Mr B, such as whether New Zealand citizens or residents were available for the position and whether it was genuine and sustainable. [10] Immigration New Zealand interviewed Mr E on 17 May 2016. He said he had found out about the job on the website of SiteWorkReady (SiteWR), a recruitment agency in the Philippines registered with the government there. Mr E contacted SiteWR and passed onto them all his details. He had email and text communications with the employee...

8. LCRO 18/2020 MP v LT (31 August 2020) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...The invoice rendered to Mr MP on 26 June 2018 is issued in Ms CR’s name. [46] The terms of engagement provided to Mr MP confirm that the letter of engagement accompanying the terms of engagement would “outline what we will do for you on the job” and identify “the person/partner with overall responsibility for the job. That person/partner will be the one we believe is most suited to that job and to our relationship with you”. [47] Ms LT, at the time a junior solicitor empl...

9. Director of Proceedings v Ramsden [2022] NZHRRT 25 [pdf, 624 KB]

   ...assessment of Mr A with a view to formulating an appropriate mental health care plan, if required. 11. On 22 August 2019 Mr A met with Mr Ramsden. 4 12. Mr Ramsden’s consultation note records that Mr A had recently resigned from his job and that workplace issues had triggered his current depressive episode. The consultation note records that Mr A reported one of the main stresses in his life at the time was financial insecurity as he was using savings and running out....

10. [2023] NZEnvC 102 The Alpine Group Limited v Southland Regional Council [pdf, 8.1 MB]

    ...transported off the barge; - 2 - AUTH-20211565 v. The use of the barge as a base or temporary accommodation facility when undertaking maintenance activities; (b) The ba rge structure shall be in accordance with the 'As Built' plans from BMC Job 1509- 1883 as follows : (c) The floating dock shall be: i. constructed and located in accordance w ith the BMC plan: Job 2303-3909 50-312 Rev E; however: 1. the floating dock must be constructed as close to the barge as possi...