Search Results

1. Final-Technical-Assessment-O-Economics-and-Town-Centre-Impacts-v2.pdf [pdf, 716 KB]

   ...indicative Project alignment crosses substantial rural areas and will impact a number of farming operations. Some farms will lose productive land, and some land may no longer be viable for current farming activities. This may in turn lead to job losses through displacement of rural sector activity. 23. That will have a negative impact on the Horowhenua economy, but one which will be very small in scale when compared to the economic benefits (including overall growth) that the Ō...

2. [2011] NZEmpC 101 Arkompat v Thai Chilli Co Ltd t/a Thai Chilli [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...consideration. That is especially so because it was Mr Arkompat‟s case that he had been asked to pay a substantial amount of money to his employer for its support of his application for a renewal of his work permit to enable him to continue in that job. This would engage questions of good faith, justification on the fair and reasonable treatment tests in s 103A, and other considerations that cannot be said to necessarily support the Authority‟s proposition. Nor is it simply, as...

3. [2015] NZEmpC 21 Haldemann LLC v Nelson [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...employer, the ICC. It was noted that Mr Katavich says that his contact with ICC was not unsolicited because she had actually listed Mr Katavich as a referee. (c) Ms Nelson had instructed counsel that she did not list Mr Katavich as a referee in her job applications. It was submitted the Court could take into account the inherent unlikelihood of her doing so, since at the time she applied for work with the ICC he had only recently dismissed her for not having invited him to a soc...

4. [2016] NZEmpC 88 TD Drilling 2014 Ltd v Crichton [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...[9] Ms Tweeddale’s evidence was disputed by Mr Crichton in his affidavit in opposition. He said that in all of his dealings with Ms Tweeddale, and Mr Tweeddale, they referred to the plaintiff companies interchangeably. He had applied for a job advertised by TD Drilling, that is, without reference to either “Limited” or “2014 Limited”. He said when interviewed by Mr Tweeddale he was offered a job working for TD Drilling; equipment used at his workplace belonged to TD Dri...

5. Coma v Real Estate Agents Authority [2019] NZREADT 14 [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...following from Mr Coma Hi, I found the following pdf which has got my name and is available to the public. It relates to a case which has been resolved. I kindly ask you to remove it off the internet as my clients may find this and could affect my job unnecessarily. Link below, please confirm once this has been deleted. [3] The link was to the Tribunal’s decision. [4] All Tribunal decisions are published on the Tribunal’s website unless an order prohibiting publication is m...

6. Justice Matters - Issue 12 - October 2018 [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...stronger belief that we’re delivering on our promises to our customers (up 13%). Our people have delivered some excellent performances in 2017/18 for the people who we serve, and I would like to conclude by thanking them for doing such a great job. What data tells us about our performance Andrew Bridgman Secretary for Justice and Chief Executive This is always an interesting time of the year as government departments are finalising their annual reports. There’s a particularly sha...

7. [2022] NZEmpC 30 Cousens v Star Nelson Holdings Ltd [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...engaging in its proceedings; (b) the contempt the defendant showed the Authority by ignoring it; and (c) the contempt the defendant has shown to the Court by not engaging in these proceedings. 4 Peter Reynolds Mechanical Ltd t/a The Italian Job Service Centre v Denyer (Labour Inspector) [2016] NZCA 464; [2017] 2 NZLR 451; [2016] ERNZ 828. [16] Supplementing those arguments was an observation that Mr Biggs, who is a director of Star Nelson, has previously been connect...

8. [2021] NZACC 80 Norman v ACC (3 June 2021) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...2017 because it was a medical case review and not a decision related to ability to work. 9. Sinclair J did not address Dr Wall’s and Dr Snell’s report regarding the use of a work trial, graduated return to work, inability to return to the job as an alarm monitor and the polypharmacy effects. 10. Sinclair J was critical of Dr Wall’s and Dr Snell’s report because they did not quote Dr Ruttenberg’s report from four years earlier, Sinclair decided that no weight was placed...

9. ID v SN [2024] NZDT 171 (18 April 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...tear during that time, and it would be unreasonable to expect it to be in exactly the same condition as it was in July 2022. 14. However, in May 2023, SN did state that “We did all the rust repair with steel so it’s straight. Needs a paint job.” SN stated at the hearing that statement was true. He said the rust repairs had been done in 2021. He said they were done professionally and done using steel. He said some bog may have been used to finish off the repairs, which is normal...

10. H Ltd v NB [2024] NZDT 843 (20 December 2024) [pdf, 118 KB]

    ...pay H Ltd $7,242.84 by 20 January 2025. Background 1. NB engaged H Ltd to manufacture and install kitchen benchtops at her property in [Suburb]. NB viewed and selected the marble slabs at VH, a wholesaler in [City]. 2. The quoted price for job was $25,652.48. NB paid a 50% deposit. 3. NB viewed the slabs again when they arrived at H Ltd’s premises in [Town], and she spoke with CK, an experienced H Ltd employee. At that time NB noticed the ‘fill’ areas in the slabs, and s...