Search Results

1. M Ltd v G Ltd [2024] NZDT 704 (27 August 2024) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...local firm to custom-build a deck for the truck and that firm, P Ltd, provided an estimate from photographs. Due to unforeseen circumstances, P Ltd was not able to carry out the work so they and [Vehicle Sales Company] arranged for G Ltd to take on the job. 2. In February 2023 G Ltd sent M Ltd a quotation for $45,521.00 which M Ltd accepted. At that stage, P Ltd was still going to build the toolboxes for the truck and had provided M Ltd a price of $6400+GST to do so. But again, P Ltd w...

2. INZ (Foley) v De'Ath [2018] NZIACDT 44 (6 November 2018) [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...very naïve and misguided reply that all INZ staff are professionals, the fact any matter within this line of communication ever had to be opened is self evident of an absence of professionalism… I have an outstanding OIA request for [Ms M’s] job description, relating to [Ms M’s] inability to comprehend a stage 1 CCRP and a failure to address 50% of the subject matter in a one page reply, which I am told [Ms M] herself did not write, by someone not willing to go on record with that...

3. Foketi v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2023] NZACC 86 [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...in July 2022, he was granted a s 61 work visa on the grounds of worker exploitation. [31] The declaration goes on to say: (5) Covid made things hard for me. My visitors visa expired and I needed to earn money to live. (6) I worked different jobs from 2020. I cleaned cars, painted houses and did labouring work on construction sites. Sometimes after I did the work, my employer refused to pay me. Sometimes they paid me less than they promised to pay me. (7) In May 2021, I got...

4. Registrar of IAA v Ryan - [2019] NZIACDT 75 (7 November 2019) [pdf, 361 KB]

   ...Dated 7 November 2019 REPRESENTATION: Registrar/Complainant: T Thompson, counsel Adviser: V Nisbet, E Blincoe, counsel 2 PRELIMINARY [1] The primary allegation against Mr Ryan, the adviser, is that he created false jobs for his clients to obtain work or residence visas in New Zealand. Mr Ryan is accused of operating a paper company or companies in the IT industry which had no real employees and no work. He is also accused of falsely claiming a connect...

5. [2015] NZEmpC 41 Denyer v Peter Reynolds Mechanical Ltd t/a The Italian Job Service Centre [pdf, 185 KB]

   JAMES DENYER, LABOUR INSPECTOR v PETER REYNOLDS MECHANICAL LIMITED TRADING AS THE ITALIAN JOB SERVICE CENTRE NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 41 [31 March 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 41 EMPC 220/2014 ARC 46/14 IN THE MATTER OF a rehearing AND IN THE MATTER of an application for penalty for breach of compliance order BETWEEN JAMES DENYER, LABOUR INSPECTOR Plaintiff AND PETER REYNOLDS MECHANICAL LIMITED...

6. S Ltd v CN [2024] NZDT 900 (13 February 2024) [pdf, 319 KB]

   ...complete the work seems excessive. 34. However, what the applicant had planned for when agreeing to “haul out” the respondent’s boat, was a “haul out” only. 35. The applicant had not expected to be “drawn into” a significant repair job with a problematic boat. 36. Hence, it is difficult for me to be critical of the applicant if there was delay due to the applicant’s resources being busy with other jobs, some of which would likely have been pre- booked ahead, or...

7. [2014] NZEmpC 135 James Denyer v Peter Reynolds Mechanical Ltd t/a The Italian Job Service Centre [pdf, 65 KB]

   JAMES DENYER, LABOUR INSPECTOR v PETER REYNOLDS MECHANICAL LIMITED TRADING AS THE ITALIAN JOB SERVICE CENTRE NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 135 [24 July 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 135 ARC 46/14 IN THE MATTER OF an application for penalty for breach of compliance order BETWEEN JAMES DENYER, LABOUR INSPECTOR Plaintiff AND PETER REYNOLDS MECHANICAL LIMITED TRADING AS THE ITALIAN JOB SERVICE CENTRE Defendant...

8. T v Mudaliar [2017] NZIACDT 10 (28 July 2017) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...and (d) of the Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2010 (the 2010 Code). [3.2] He dishonestly prepared and submitted documentation to Immigration New Zealand to support his client’s residence application. In essence, he drafted a job description to fit an immigration requirement, rather than one that described what his client, in fact, did. Accordingly, the Tribunal found Mr Mudaliar engaged in dishonest and misleading behaviour, which is a ground of complaint under...

9. UT v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 852 (22 August 2024) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...dismissed. Reasons: 1. UT engaged T Ltd to move personal items and furniture in February 2024. UT transferred $500 to T Ltd. 2. T Ltd claim it did not request a payment of $500, it only required $299 to confirm the booking and the rest of the job was charged per hour. 3. UT claims the removalist did not complete the job due to parking restrictions outside his property. The yellow lines outside UT’s property meant the removalist would have to park 100 meters away. UT c...

10. NO v ST [2023] NZDT 80 (6 July 2023) [pdf, 262 KB]

    ...series of invoices with the amount due increasing significantly with each one. 12. The Respondent failed to come to inspect the damage to the sink. The Respondent has acknowledged that the cleaner called him from the Applicant’s home during the job and was upset. However, the Respondent now claims that the cleaner was upset because she observed scratches in the sink, not because she caused them, and that she couldn’t see the bottom of the sink due to the heavy layers of soap and to...