Search Results

Search results for judges.

16621 items matching your search terms

  1. Family Fixed Fees Schedules July 2020 updated 28 October 22 [pdf, 482 KB]

    ...Judicial Conference(s) – Hearing Time $67 per half hour For • Attending judicial conference(s) Defended Hearing(s) Activity Fees Tasks Defended Hearing(s) – Preparation * Estimate required by amendment For • Complying with Judge’s directions such as updating affidavits • Preparing application for amendment to grant (including confirmation of anticipated hearing time) • Reviewing file • Preparing for defended hearing – cross examination, briefing wit...

  2. Muru v Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust - Wani Wani 1 Block [2017] Māori Appellate Court MB 348 (2017 APPEAL 348) [pdf, 197 KB]

    ...IN THE MATTER OF WANI WANI 1 BLOCK BETWEEN WIREMU HIRA RICK MURU AS TRUSTEE OF WANI WANI 1 TRUST Appellant AND MAUNGATAUTARI ECOLOGICAL ISLAND TRUST Respondent Hearing: Court: On the papers Judge M P Armstrong (presiding) Judge L R Harvey Judge M J Doogan Counsel: P Jeffries for Appellant S Garmonsway for Respondent Judgment: 6 October 2017 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT ON COSTS...

  3. Hill - Mangatainoka 1BC NO2B NO3 [2018] Chief Judge's MB 250 (2018 CJ 250) [pdf, 152 KB]

    2018 Chief Judge’s MB 250 Place: Wellington Date: 13 July 2018 Present: W W Isaac, Chief Judge M G Dittmer, Clerk of the Court A20180004894 An application filed by FREDRICK HILL pursuant to rule 4.10(3) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 to review a decision of the Registrar made on 27 June 2018, to refuse to accept a Notice of Appeal in respect of MANGATAINOKA 1 BC NO 2B NO 3 Chief Judge Introduction 1. This is an application by Fredrick Hill (th

  4. National Standards Committee 1 v Deliu [2016] NZLCDT 27 [pdf, 480 KB]

    ...Zealand, the charges of incompetence are a nonsense. [4] The charges are reproduced as Appendix A to this decision. Other related charges [5] These charges were heard by the same Tribunal that considered consolidated charges LCDT 008/12 (‘the Judges charges’) and LCDT 010/10 over 10 days, from 30 September to 9 October, and 10 December 2015. The decisions on the three sets of charges are given together. [6] Mr Deliu (the practitioner) is the sole director and principal...

  5. Improving jury trial timeliness - Discussion document [pdf, 447 KB]

    ...recognises that the right is not absolute. It establishes a limit, or threshold, to distinguish between what cases are suitable for a jury trial, and which are not. If a defendant does not elect a jury trial, their case will instead be heard by a judge without a jury, referred to as a judge-alone trial. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights3 does not require a jury trial, rather it provides for the right to a “fair and public hearing”. Why are juries impor...

  7. [2014] NZEmpC 128 Huang v Li [pdf, 118 KB]

    ...(on the papers by documents dated 31 October 2012, 12 November 2012, 24 May 2014 and 31 May 2014) Appearances: Applicant in person G Ogilvie, advocate for the respondent Judgment: 14 July 2014 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] This judgment decides an interlocutory application for orders as to security for costs and stay of the applicant’s application for rehearing. [2] The applicant originally pursued a claim against t...

  8. LCRO 179/2019 HL v [Area] Standards Committee (30 April 2020) [pdf, 181 KB]

    ...It was Mr A’s view, that his hair may have been contaminated as a consequence of his involvement in a brief relationship with an individual who had dabbled in the use of methamphetamine. It was argument of accidental contamination. [6] The judge presiding over the proceedings issued a minute on [Date], in which a direction was made that Mr A was to file an affidavit stating on oath whether he had used methamphetamine or any other illicit drug since [Date]. If it was Mr A’s pos...

  9. Kotahitanga Log Haulage Limited v Forest Distribution Limited - Mangaroa (2015) 121 Waiariki MB 149 (121 WAR 149) [pdf, 162 KB]

    ...(Heard at Tauranga) 19 December 2014 (Heard at Rotorua) Appearances: Mr M Beech & Ms Braddock for the first, second and third applicants Mr C Bidois, for the respondent Judgment: 05 May 2015 ORAL JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M J DOOGAN Copies to: Mark Beech, Holland Beckett Lawyers email: mark.beech@hobec.co.nz Curtis Bidois, East Brewster email: bidois@eastbrewster.co.nz mailto:mark.beech@hobec.co.nz mailto:bidois@eastbrewster.co.nz 121 Waiariki...

  10. Hamilton-Tuahu3X (2009) 34 Gisborne MB 230 (34 APGS 230) [pdf, 55 KB]

    ...COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRAWHITI DISTRICT 34 GISBORNE APPELLATE MINUTE BOOK 230 A20090010024 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Tuahu 3X (Erepeti Marae) Appeal HIRO HARE HAMILTON Appellant Coram: Judge S Clark Judge P Savage Judge D Ambler Hearing: 12 November 2009 (Heard at Gisborne) Appearances: B Tupara for H Hamilton P Harman for Erepeti Marae Trustees Judgment: 12 November 2009 ORAL JUDGMENT OF THE APPELLATE COU...