Search Results

Search results for judges.

16621 items matching your search terms

  1. [2021] NZACC 146 – Buis v ACC (28 September 2021) [pdf, 248 KB]

    ...BETWEEN MICHAEL BUIS Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the Papers Judgment: 28 September 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D CLARK [Leave to Appeal: s 162 Accident Compensation Act 2001] ___________________________________________________________________________ Introduction [1] Mr Buis applies for leave to appeal to the High Court under s 162 of the Accid...

  2. OIA-100246.pdf [pdf, 1.4 MB]

    ...normalisation of deviance (as the social expectations and social norm compliance change). Some participants believed that only the judiciary had the power to enforce consistent standards and clear expectations (while other participants thought that the judges were a major contributor to the inconsistent application of the CPA). RE LE AS ED U ND ER T HE O FF IC IA L IN FO RM AT IO N AC T 19 82 P a g e | 12 researchfirst.co.nz 4.5 THE SYSTEM OPERATES INCONSIS...

  3. Rangi v Larkins - Estate of Hakaraia Muru Waata - (2018) Chief Judge's MB 25 (2018 CJ 25) [pdf, 248 KB]

    2018 Chief Judge’s MB 25 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTICT A20120007702 CJ 2012/12 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF HAKARAIA MURU WAATA – Application to the Chief Judge BETWEEN EUNICE RANGI ALAN WALTERS WILLIAM WALTERS TILLY WALTERS Applicants AND GORDON LARKINS KATHLEEN NEHO Respondents Hearing: 23 April 2018 (Heard at Whangarei) Judgment: 23...

  4. Heaslip - The Estate of Wilhelmina Floate or Wilhelmina Fisher or Wilhelmina Newton (2005) 110 South Island MB 110 (110 SI 110) [pdf, 1002 KB]

    Millute Bool<: 110 SI 110 IN THE MAoRI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TE WAIPOUNAMU DISTRICT Place: Present: Date: Application No: Subject: Section: Hearing: Applicant: Introduction Wellington C M Wainwright, Judge Claire Mason, Clerk of the Court 9 February 2005 A 19990005454 A19990005455 A19990005458 Wilhelmina Floate (or Fisher or Newton) 118/93 3 November 2004 Theona Mina Heaslip RESERVED DECISION Theona Heaslip has filed an application seeking a...

  5. [2018] NZEmpC 142 Noble v Ballooning Canterbury.com Ltd [pdf, 220 KB]

    ...CANTERBURY.COM LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: J Goldstein and L Ryder, counsel for plaintiff A Toohey and G Wakefield, counsel for defendant Judgment: 3 December 2018 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE J C HOLDEN (Application for costs on an application for security for costs) [1] By judgment dated 16 August 2018 Judge Corkill ordered Mr Noble to pay security for costs to be held by the Registrar of the Employment Court.1 He recor...

  6. MOJ0587_OCT21_web.pdf [pdf, 73 KB]

    ...patient must be released. Right to review during assessment The patient can ask the Family Court to review their condition any time during the preliminary assessment and further assessment before the responsible clinician has applied for a CTO. If the judge decides that the patient can be released from having a mental health assessment, the patient must be discharged immediately and that is the end of the assessment process. Compulsory Treatment Orders A CTO is when a court orders that...

  7. LEG-Paper-Rules-Committee-Matariki-Amendment-Rules-FINAL.pdf [pdf, 959 KB]

    ...and are approved by the Rules Committee (the Committee). The Rules Committee 3. The Committee is a statutory body established under section 155 of the Senior Courts Act 2016. Members of the Committee include the Chief Justice, the Chief High Court Judge, the Chief District Court Judge, the Attorney-General, the Solicitor- General, the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Justice, and selected judges and lawyers. Rules of the Senior Courts and District Court are made by Order in Council, with t...

  8. The Sentencing Act 2002: monitoring the first year [pdf, 167 KB]

    ...closely compared with those of another”. In sentencing offenders, the courts are not concerned with fine distinctions, rather “at achieving reasonable uniformity and avoiding substantial and unjustified disparity”. 11. The Act assists sentencing judges and the appeal court in that exercise by providing purposes, principles and sentencing guidance against which to assess a particular decision and provide a basis for comparison between cases. 12. A perusal of sentencing notes from cases d...

  9. [2013] NZEmpC 183 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 100 KB]

    ...(Heard at Wellington) Appearances: Richard Fletcher and Michael Okkerse, counsel for the plaintiff Michael Quigg, Nicolas Logan and Jol Bates, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 1 October 2013 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A D FORD The application [1] At the commencement of this hearing on 30 September 2013, I heard argument on an application filed by the plaintiff on the afternoon of Friday, 27 September 2013 for an order entering judgment in...