Search Results

1. BL v TX & L Ltd [2025] NZDT 239 (13 June 2025) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $260 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than...

2. QQ v F Ltd [2025] NZDT 231 (27 May 2025) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $260 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than...

3. DU v UT [2025] NZDT 228 (8 July 2025) [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $260 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than...

4. NF v B Ltd [2025] NZDT 227 (17 July 2025) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $260 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than...

5. Wellington Standards Committee v Lester [2015] NZLCDT 23 [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZLCDT 23 LCDT 043/14 BETWEEN WELLINGTON STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 OF THE NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY Applicant AND DIANNE LESTER of Wellington, Solicitor Respondent Judge BJ Kendall (retired) CHAIR Mr M Gough MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr S Maling Mr A Marshall Mr K Raureti HEARING at Wellington Tribunals Office DATE 26 June 2015 DATE OF DECISION 9 July 2015 Mr S Kinsler and Ms C Cross for the...

6. [2007] National Distribution Union Inc v General Distributors Ltd AK AC 7/07 [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...for declarations, penalties and damages removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NATIONAL DISTRIBUTION UNION INC Plaintiff AND GENERAL DISTRIBUTORS LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 7, 8, 9 and 10 February 2006 Court: Chief Judge GL Colgan Judge BS Travis Judge AA Couch Appearances: David Fleming and Gregory Lloyd, Counsel for Plaintiff Stephen Langton and Alison Clements, Counsel for Defendant Tim Cleary, Counsel for Business New Zealand Inc as Intervener by...

7. LCRO 2011 Annual Report [pdf, 919 KB]

   Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to Section 223 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 Report of the LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER For the 12 months ended 30 June 2011 Annual Report 2011 | Legal Complaints Review Officer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ___________________________________________________________________________________________ LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICE Overview of the year 2009/2010 ........................................

8. [2022] NZEnvC 162 Middle Hill Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 162 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN MIDDLE HILL LIMITED ENV-2020-AKL-000048 Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Environment Commissioner RM Bartlett Environment Commissioner A Gysberts Hearing: 29 June – 3 July 2021 Last Case Event: Submissions in reply 16 July 2021 Appearances: P Fuller for Middle Hill D Hartley and A Buchan...

9. [2024] NZEnvC 225 Auckland International Airport Limited v Auckland Transport [pdf, 6 MB]

   ...(ENV-2024-AKL-000065) WIRI OIL SERVICES LIMITED (ENV-2024-AKL-000067) Appellants AUCKLAND TRANSPORT NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY Respondents AUCKLAND COUNCIL CHANNEL TERMINAL SERVICES LIMITED Section 274 Interested Parties Court: Environment Judge M J L Dickey1 sitting alone under s 279(1)(b) of the Act Last case event: 9 August 2024 1 Judge M J L Dickey is the Acting Judge for this matter in the absence of Judge J A Smith 2 Date of Order: 16 September 2024 Da...

10. [2016] NZEmpC 20 Roy v Board of Trustees of Tamaki College [pdf, 522 KB]

    ...counsel and me) where there is a full audio recording of everything said and from which a transcript was prepared and distributed during the hearing. There has been no complaint made about the accuracy of that transcript. [27] In cases such as this, Judges prefer generally not to, and usually do not have to, reach generalised, pervasive and adverse views about the credibility of a witness. Many discrepancies between people’s accounts of events differ for a variety of reasons but...