Search Results

Search results for judges.

17104 items matching your search terms

  1. ENV-2018-AKL-000149 Fulton Hogan Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 7.9 MB]

    NOTICE OF APPEAL 26 JULY 2018 Counsel instructed: Bal Matheson Richmond Chambers PO Box 1008 Auckland 1140 Solicitor acting: D J Minhinnick I L J Eaton P +64 9 367 8000 F +64 9 367 8163 PO Box 8 DX CX10085 Auckland BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV–2018–AKL - AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO I TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE UNDER the Local Government Act (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 ("LGATPA ") and

  2. ENV-2018-AKL-000150 Brookby Quarries Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 8.3 MB]

    NOTICE OF APPEAL 26 JULY 2018 Counsel instructed: Solicitors acting: Russell Bartlett QC / Bal Matheson D J Minhinnick / L J Eaton C/- Richmond Chambers P +64 9 367 8000 33 Shortland Street F +64 9 367 8163 PO Box 1008 PO Box 8 Auckland 1140 DX CX10085 Auckland BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV–2018 –AKL - AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO I TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE UNDER the Local Government Act (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (&

  3. [2018] NZEnvC 250 Granger & Ors v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 13 MB]

    ...to s 120 of the Act GRAEME GRANGER, CRAIG WERNER, HAMISH FORRESTER, KATRINA BERKENBUSCH, MEGAN BARDELL, TOM MYERS (ENV-2017 -CHC-038) Appellants DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent PENINSULA HOLDINGS TRUST Applicant Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick Environment Commissioner R M Dunlop Environment Commissioner J T Baines Hearing: at Dunedin on 13, 14, 15 and 16 August 2018 Supplementary evidence and submissions 7 December 2018 Appearances: G Granger and H Forrester in...

  4. Inaia Tonu Nei - Hui Maori - Combined version PDF [pdf, 7.2 MB]

    Kua tae te wā Te Pūrongo a Te Hui Māori HŌNGONGOI 2019 Hei whakarāpopoto tēnei pūrongo i ngā kōrero i puta rā i te hui e kīa nei Ināia Tonu Nei – Hui Māori i tū i Rotorua mai i te 5–7 Āperira 2019. Nā tētahi tira iti i tuhi ngā kōrero o te Hui Māori, nāna hoki i kohi ngā whakaaro mai i ngā whakawhitinga kōrero, i ngā kauwhau me ngā mahi ā-rōpū. Te whāinga o tēnei pukapuka he hopu i ngā kōrero i puta i te Hui, me te tāpae horopaki hoki mō te pūta

  5. [2023] NZEnvC 111 Schmuck v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 12 MB]

    ...application under s 88 RMA BETWEEN D C SCHMUCK (ENV-2018-AKL-000351) (ENV-2020-AKL-000187) Appellant AND NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent AND M K RASHBROOKE s274 RMA Interested Party (ENV-2020-AKL-000187) Court: Alternate Environment Judge L J Newhook Environment Commissioner S Myers Submissions: C Prendergast for Appellant G Mathias and C Sharp for Respondent M Rashbrooke for Himself Date of Decision: (On the papers) 30 May 2023 Date of Issue: 30 M...

  6. [2024] NZEnvC 194 Connor [pdf, 1.4 MB]

    ...resource consent to demolish an existing dwelling and construct a new dwelling and additional structures at 22 Crescent Road, Epsom, Auckland BETWEEN C CONNOR (ENV-2024-AKL-025) Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Consent Authority Court: Judge J A Smith Commissioner G Paine Commissioner S Myers Hearing: 22 – 25 July 2024 at Auckland Last case event: 25 July 2024 Appearances: R E Bartlett KC and A M Cameron for C Connor (Applicant) M C Allan and R H Ashton for Auckland Cou...

  7. [2024] NZEmpC 123 Wiles v University of Auckland [pdf, 536 KB]

    ...WILES Plaintiff AND THE VICE-CHANCELLOR OF THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND Defendant Hearing: 6-24, 28 November 2023 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: C W Stewart and D Church, counsel for plaintiff P Skelton KC, R Judge and S-J Lloyd, counsel for defendant Judgment: 8 July 2024 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE J C HOLDEN Contents These proceedings arise in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic .................... [1] The parties agree on the pr...

  8. [2023] NZEmpC 168 AJY v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 545 KB]

    ...2023, 29– 31 March 2023 (Heard at Hamilton) 3 May 2023 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: JA Hope, counsel for AJY E Coats and A Codlin, counsel for Department of Corrections Judgment: 3 October 2023 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE KATHRYN BECK [1] Both parties have challenged the determination of the Employment Relations Authority which found that the Department of Corrections (Corrections) had unjustifiably disadvantaged and unjustifiably dismissed AJ...

  9. Shaw v CAC 10062 & Pemberton [2012] NZREADT 48 [pdf, 41 KB]

    ...advertisements for him. However the mutual trust between the two of them was shattered by the discovery of the new e-mails. [11] These events took place in early 2009, before the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 came into force in effect. We therefore must judge Mr Pemberton by the standards of that time; and, whilst we can find him guilty of offences under the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 we cannot impose upon him a penalty which was not available under the 1976 Act. Having considered al...

  10. ENVC Matiatia party corresp WMLFeb15 submission oppose DMI interlocutory [pdf, 2.5 MB]

    ...its adverse effects, there is no challenge to the consent authority or court's jurisdiction to hear the modified application ".6 11 , The Court decision traverses a range of Environment Court decisions, High Court and Court of Appeal judgements, and the Supreme Court judgement in Estate Homes7 and states that difficulties tend to arise only when a modification is perceived to increase the potential adverse effects on at least one or more persons, The Environment Court...